Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 74, 104720, June 2023

Using participatory action research to develop a new self-management program: Results from the design stage of Managing My MS My Way

  • Elizabeth S. Gromisch
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Address: 490 Blue Hills Avenue, Hartford, CT 06112, USA.
    Affiliations
    Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, Trinity Health Of New England, 490 Blue Hills Avenue, Hartford, CT 06112, USA

    Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, 370 Bassett Road, North Haven, CT 06473, USA

    Department of Medical Sciences, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, 370 Bassett Road, North Haven, CT 06473, USA

    Department of Neurology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dawn M. Ehde
    Affiliations
    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Lindsay O. Neto
    Affiliations
    Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, Trinity Health Of New England, 490 Blue Hills Avenue, Hartford, CT 06112, USA

    Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, 370 Bassett Road, North Haven, CT 06473, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jodie K. Haselkorn
    Affiliations
    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA

    Multiple Sclerosis Center of Excellence West, Veterans Affairs, 1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA

    Rehabilitation Care Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA

    Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Thomas Agresta
    Affiliations
    Department of Family Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, 99 Woodland Street, Hartford, CT 06105, USA

    Center for Quantitative Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, 195 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06032, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Swapna S. Gokhale
    Affiliations
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Aaron P. Turner
    Affiliations
    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA

    Multiple Sclerosis Center of Excellence West, Veterans Affairs, 1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA

    Rehabilitation Care Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
    Search for articles by this author

      Highlights

      • Persons with MS surveyed expressed an interest in a self-management program.
      • Stakeholders preferred a fatigue mHealth program, but with an in-person orientation.
      • The option to skip sections that were not pertinent was suggested.
      • Other adaptations included setting reminders and visualizing their progress.

      Abstract

      Background

      Self-management programs have been used with success in several clinical populations, and there is a growing body of evidence to support their use among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). This group aimed to develop a novel self-management program, Managing My MS My Way (M4W), which is based in social cognitive theory and contains evidence-based strategies that have been shown to be effective for persons with MS. Furthermore, persons with MS would serve as stakeholders throughout the development process to ensure that the program would be useful and encourage adoption. This paper outlines the initial development stages of M4W, including determining 1) stakeholders’ interest in a self-management program, 2) the general focus of the program, 3) the delivery method of the program, 4) the content of the program, and 5) potential barriers and adaptations.

      Methods

      A three-stage study consisting of an anonymous survey (n = 187) to determine interest, topic, and delivery format; semi-structured interviews (n = 6) to follow-up on the survey results; and semi-structured interviews (n = 10) to refine the content and identify barriers.

      Results

      Over 80% of survey participants were somewhat or very interested in a self-management program. Fatigue was the topic with the greatest amount of interest (64.7%). An internet-based program (e.g., mobile health or mHealth) was the most preferred delivery method (37.4%), with the first group of stakeholders proposing a module-based system with an initial in-person orientation session. The second group of stakeholders were overall enthusiastic about the program, giving moderate to high confidence scores for each of the proposed interventional strategies. Suggestions included skipping sections that were not applicable to them, setting reminders, and seeing their progress (e.g., visualizing their fatigue scores as they move through the program). In addition, stakeholders recommended larger font sizes and speech-to-text entry.

      Conclusions

      Input from the stakeholders has been incorporated into the prototype of M4W. The next steps will be to test this prototype with another group of stakeholders to assess its initial usability and identify issues before developing the functional prototype.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Akbar N.
        • Turpin K.
        • Petrin J.
        • Smyth P.
        • Finlayson M.
        A pilot mixed-methods evaluation of MS INFoRm: a self-directed fatigue management resource for individuals with multiple sclerosis.
        Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 2018; 41: 114-121
        • Amato M.
        • Ponziani G.
        • Rossi F.
        • Liedl C.
        • Stefanile C.
        • Rossi L.
        Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: the impact of depression, fatigue and disability.
        Multiple Sclerosis J. 2001; 7: 340-344
      1. Asano, M., Finlayson, M.L.J.M.s.i., 2014. Meta-analysis of three different types of fatigue management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: exercise, education, and medication. 2014.

        • Babbage D.R.
        • van Kessel K.
        • Drown J.
        • Thomas S.
        • Sezier A.
        • Thomas P.
        • Kersten P.
        MS Energize: field trial of an app for self-management of fatigue for people with multiple sclerosis.
        Internet Intervent. 2019; 18100291
        • Bandura A.
        Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective.
        Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001; 52: 1-26
        • Barlow J.
        • Turner A.
        • Edwards R.
        • Gilchrist M.
        A randomised controlled trial of lay-led self-management for people with multiple sclerosis.
        Patient Educ. Couns. 2009; 77: 81-89
        • Bevens W.
        • Weiland T.J.
        • Gray K.
        • Neate S.L.
        • Nag N.
        • Simpson-Yap S.
        • Reece J.
        • Yu M.
        • Jelinek G.A.
        The feasibility of a web-based educational lifestyle program for people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
        Front. Public Health. 2022; : 1145
        • Bishop M.
        • Frain M.P.
        The Multiple Sclerosis Self-Management Scale: revision and psychometric analysis.
        Rehabil. Psychol. 2011; 56: 150
        • D'hooghe M.
        • Van Gassen G.
        • Kos D.
        • Bouquiaux O.
        • Cambron M.
        • Decoo D.
        • Lysandropoulos A.
        • Van Wijmeersch B.
        • Willekens B.
        • Penner I.-.K.
        Improving fatigue in multiple sclerosis by smartphone-supported energy management: the MS TeleCoach feasibility study.
        Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2018; 22: 90-96
        • Damanabi S.
        • Salimzadeh Z.
        • Kalankesh L.R.
        • Shaafi S.
        • Ferdousi R.
        Exploring self-management needs of persons with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study for mobile application development.
        Int. J. MS Care. 2021;
        • Ehde D.M.
        • Elzea J.L.
        • Verrall A.M.
        • Gibbons L.E.
        • Smith A.E.
        • Amtmann D.
        Efficacy of a telephone-delivered self-management intervention for persons with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial with a one-year follow-up.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2015; 96 (e1942): 1945-1958
        • Faulkner L.
        Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing.
        Research Methods, Instruments, Comput. 2003; 35: 379-383
        • Fereday J.
        • Muir-Cochrane E.
        Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development.
        Int. J. Qual. Methods. 2006; 5: 80-92
        • Finlayson M.
        • Preissner K.
        • Cho C.
        • Plow M.
        Randomized trial of a teleconference-delivered fatigue management program for people with multiple sclerosis.
        Multiple Sclerosis J. 2011; 17: 1130-1140
        • Foley F.W.
        • Bedell J.R.
        • LaRocca N.G.
        • Scheinberg L.C.
        • Reznikoff M.
        Efficacy of stress-inoculation training in coping with multiple sclerosis.
        J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1987; 55: 919
        • Fraser R.
        • Ehde D.
        • Amtmann D.
        • Verrall A.
        • Johnson K.L.
        • Johnson E.
        • Kraft G.H.
        Self-Management for People with Multiple Sclerosis: report from the First International Consensus Conference, November 15, 2010.
        Int J MS Care. 2013; 15: 99-106
        • García Jalón E.G.
        • Lennon S.
        • Peoples L.
        • Murphy S.
        • Lowe-Strong A.
        Energy conservation for fatigue management in multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
        Clin. Rehabil. 2013; 27: 63-74
        • Ghahari S.
        • Packer T.L.
        • Passmore A.E.
        Development, standardisation and pilot testing of an online fatigue self-management program.
        Disabil. Rehabil. 2009; 31: 1762-1772
        • Giunti G.
        • Mylonopoulou V.
        • Romero O.R.
        More stamina, a gamified mhealth solution for persons with multiple sclerosis: research through design.
        JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6: e51
        • Gromisch E.S.
        • Turner A.P.
        • Haselkorn J.K.
        • Lo A.C.
        • Agresta T.
        Mobile health (mHealth) usage, barriers, and technological considerations in persons with multiple sclerosis: a literature review.
        JAMIA Open. 2021; 4
        • Hennink M.
        • Kaiser B.N.
        Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests.
        Soc. Sci. Med. 2021; 114523
        • Hohol M.
        • Orav E.
        • Weiner H.
        Disease Steps in multiple sclerosis A simple approach to evaluate disease progression.
        Neurology. 1995; 45: 251-255
        • Hohol M.
        • Orav E.
        • Weiner H.
        Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study comparing disease steps and EDSS to evaluate disease progression.
        Multiple Sclerosis J. 1999; 5: 349-354
        • Institute of Medicine
        Living Well with Chronic Illness.
        A Call for Public Health Action, Washington, DC2012
        • Janardhan V.
        • Bakshi R.
        Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: the impact of fatigue and depression.
        J. Neurol. Sci. 2002; 205: 51-58
        • Jongen P.J.
        • Sinnige L.G.
        • van Geel B.M.
        • Verheul F.
        • Verhagen W.I.
        • van der Kruijk R.A.
        • Haverkamp R.
        • Schrijver H.M.
        • Baart J.C.
        • Visser L.H.
        The interactive web-based program MSmonitor for self-management and multidisciplinary care in multiple sclerosis: concept, content, and pilot results.
        Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015; 9: 1741
        • Julian L.J.
        • Vella L.
        • Vollmer T.
        • Hadjimichael O.
        • Mohr D.C.
        Employment in multiple sclerosis.
        J. Neurol. 2008; 255: 1354-1360
        • Kos D.
        • Duportail M.
        • Meirte J.
        • Meeus M.
        • D'hooghe M.B.
        • Nagels G.
        • Willekens B.
        • Meurrens T.
        • Ilsbroukx S.
        • Nijs J.
        The effectiveness of a self-management occupational therapy intervention on activity performance in individuals with multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: a randomized-controlled trial.
        Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 2016; 39: 255-262
        • Kratz A.L.
        • Alschuler K.N.
        • Williams D.A.
        • Ehde D.M.
        Development and pilot testing of a web-based symptom management program for multiple sclerosis: my MS toolkit.
        Rehabil Psychol. 2021; 66: 224
        • Krupp L.B.
        • LaRocca N.G.
        • Muir-Nash J.
        • Steinberg A.D.
        The fatigue severity scale: application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus.
        Arch. Neurol. 1989; 46: 1121-1123
        • Learmonth Y.C.
        • Motl R.W.
        • Sandroff B.M.
        • Pula J.H.
        • Cadavid D.
        Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis.
        BMC Neurol. 2013; 13: 37
        • Lorig K.R.
        • Holman H.R.
        Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms.
        Ann. Behav. Med. 2003; 26: 1-7
        • Marrie R.A.
        • Goldman M.
        Validity of performance scales for disability assessment in multiple sclerosis.
        Multiple Sclerosis J. 2007; 13: 1176-1182
        • Minden S.L.
        • Frankel D.
        • Perloff J.
        • Srinath K.P.
        • Hoaglin D.C.
        The Sonya Slifka Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Study: methods and sample characteristics.
        Multiple Sclerosis J. 2006; 12: 24-38
        • Mohr D.C.
        • Likosky W.
        • Bertagnolli A.
        • Goodkin D.E.
        • Van Der Wende J.
        • Dwyer P.
        • Dick L.P.
        Telephone-administered cognitive–behavioral therapy for the treatment of depressive symptoms in multiple sclerosis.
        J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2000; 68: 356
        • Moss-Morris R.
        • McCrone P.
        • Yardley L.
        • van Kessel K.
        • Wills G.
        • Dennison L.
        A pilot randomised controlled trial of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy self-management programme (MS Invigor8) for multiple sclerosis fatigue.
        Behav. Res. Ther. 2012; 50: 415-421
        • Mulligan H.
        • Wilkinson A.
        • Barclay A.
        • Whiting H.
        • Heynike C.
        • Snowdon J.
        Evaluation of a Fatigue Self-Management Program for People with Multiple Sclerosis.
        Int. J. MS Care. 2016; 18: 116-121
      2. New York University School of Global Public Health, n.d. Overview of MOST. https://publichealth.nyu.edu/w/ioi/optimizing-behavioral-biobehavioral-interventions/overview#:~:text=MOST%20is%20a%20comprehensive%2C%20principled,multicomponent%20behavioral%20and%20biobehavioral%20interventions. (Accessed September 28 2022).

        • Norman C.D.
        • Skinner H.A.
        eHEALS: the eHealth literacy scale.
        J. Med. Internet Res. 2006; 8: e27
        • Pender N.J.
        • Murdaugh C.L.
        • Parsons M.A.
        • Ann M.
        Health Promotion in Nursing Practice.
        Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ2006
        • Plow M.
        • Finlayson M.
        • Liu J.
        • Motl R.W.
        • Bethoux F.
        • Sattar A.
        Randomized controlled trial of a telephone-delivered physical activity and fatigue self-management interventions in adults with multiple sclerosis.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2019; 100: 2006-2014
        • Plow M.
        • Finlayson M.
        • Motl R.W.
        • Bethoux F.
        Randomized controlled trial of a teleconference fatigue management plus physical activity intervention in adults with multiple sclerosis: rationale and research protocol.
        BMC Neurol. 2012; 12: 122
        • Plow M.A.
        • Finlayson M.
        • Rezac M.
        A Scoping Review of Self-Management Interventions for Adults With Multiple Sclerosis.
        PM&R. 2011; 3: 251-262
        • Pöttgen J.
        • Moss-Morris R.
        • Wendebourg J.-.M.
        • Feddersen L.
        • Lau S.
        • Köpke S.
        • Meyer B.
        • Friede T.
        • Penner I.-.K.
        • Heesen C.
        Randomised controlled trial of a self-guided online fatigue intervention in multiple sclerosis.
        J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2018; (jnnp-2017-)317463
        • Prochaska J.O.
        • Velicer W.F.
        The transtheoretical model of health behavior change.
        Am. J. Health Promot. 1997; 12: 38-48
        • Smith A.
        Symbol Digit Modalities Test: Manual.
        Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA1982
        • Smith M.M.
        • Arnett P.A.
        Factors related to employment status changes in individuals with multiple sclerosis.
        Multiple Sclerosis J. 2005; 11: 602-609
        • Smith Y.
        • Garcia-Torres R.
        • Coughlin S.S.
        • Ling J.
        • Marin T.
        • Su S.
        • Young L.
        Effectiveness of social cognitive theory–based interventions for glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        JMIR Res. Protoc. 2020; 9: e17148
        • Stuifbergen A.K.
        Building health promotion interventions for persons with chronic disabling conditions.
        Fam. Community Health. 2006; 29: 28S-34S
        • The Multiple Sclerosis International Federation (MSIF)
        Part 1: Mapping multiple Sclerosis Around the world, Key Epidemiology Findings.
        3rd ed. Atlas of MS, 2020
        • Thomas S.
        • Kersten P.
        • Thomas P.W.
        • Slingsby V.
        • Nock A.
        • Jones R.
        • Smith A.D.
        • Galvin K.T.
        • Baker R.
        • Hillier C.
        Exploring strategies used following a group-based fatigue management programme for people with multiple sclerosis (FACETS) via the Fatigue Management Strategies Questionnaire (FMSQ).
        BMJ Open. 2015; 5e008274
        • Thomas S.
        • Pulman A.
        • Dogan H.
        • Jiang N.
        • Passmore D.
        • Pretty K.
        • Fairbanks B.
        • Smith A.D.
        • Thomas P.W.
        Creating a digital toolkit to reduce fatigue and promote quality of life in multiple sclerosis: participatory design and usability study.
        JMIR formative Research. 2021; 5: e19230
        • Thomas S.
        • Thomas P.W.
        • Kersten P.
        • Jones R.
        • Green C.
        • Nock A.
        • Slingsby V.
        • Smith A.D.
        • Baker R.
        • Galvin K.T.
        A pragmatic parallel arm multi-centre randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based fatigue management programme (FACETS) for people with multiple sclerosis.
        J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2013; (jnnp-2012-)303816
      3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010. Multiple Chronic Conditions–A Strategic Framework: Optimum Health and Quality of Life for Individuals with Multiple Chronic Conditions. Washington, DC.

      4. University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale 2017 (UW-SES) Version 1 Users Guide. https://uwcorr.washington.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/uw-ses-userguide.pdf. (Accessed April 22 2019,).

        • van den Akker L.E.
        • Beckerman H.
        • Collette E.H.
        • Eijssen I.C.J.M.
        • Dekker J.
        • de Groot V.
        Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J. Psychosom. Res. 2016; 90: 33-42
        • van Haasteren A.
        • Gille F.
        • Fadda M.
        • Vayena E.
        Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist.
        Digital health. 2019; 52055207619886463
        • Van Heest K.N.
        • Mogush A.R.
        • Mathiowetz V.G.
        Effects of a one-to-one Fatigue Management course for people with chronic conditions and fatigue.
        Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2017; 71 (7104100020p7104100021-7104100020p7104100029)
      5. Van Kessel, K., Moss-Morris, R., 2006. Understanding multiple sclerosis fatigue: a synthesis of biological and psychological factors.

        • Wallin M.T.
        • Culpepper W.J.
        • Campbell J.D.
        • Nelson L.M.
        • Langer-Gould A.
        • Marrie R.A.
        • Cutter G.R.
        • Kaye W.E.
        • Wagner L.
        • Tremlett H.
        The prevalence of MS in the United States: a population-based estimate using health claims data.
        Neurology. 2019; 10 (/WNL. 0000000000007035): 1212
        • Wechsler D.
        Test of Premorbid Functioning.
        The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX2009
        • Zhang J.
        • Walji M.F.
        TURF: toward a unified framework of EHR usability.
        J. Biomed. Inform. 2011; 44: 1056-1067