Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 70, 104507, February 2023

The effect of telenursing education of self-care on health-promoting behaviors in patients with multiple sclerosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: A clinical trial study

Published:January 05, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2023.104507

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Multiple sclerosis is associated with decrease in health-promoting behaviors (HPBs) and require appropriate nursing interventions. Telenursing can play an important role in education of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in which face-to-face education is limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of self-care education with telenursing approach on HPBs in patients with MS.

      Materials and methods

      In this clinical trial, 68 patients with MS were selected using simple random sampling from Jahrom MS Society and randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 34) and control (n = 34) groups. In the intervention group, educational sessions were held three days a week for six weeks. Data were collected using demographic information and Walker's Health-Promoting Lifestyle questionnaires before and immediately after the intervention. Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests using SPSS software (Ver. 21).

      Results

      Based on the findings, immediately after the intervention, the mean score of HPBs was significantly higher (p = 0.005) in the intervention group (145.38 ± 26.66) than the control group (129.18 ± 22.35). The means of nutrition, exercise, health responsibility, and stress management were significantly different between the intervention and control groups immediately after the intervention (p < 0.05).

      Conclusion

      results this study indicated that self-care education with telenursing approach was effective on HPBs in patients with MS. It can be beneficial to employ as an educative-supportive approach in MS patients.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      HPBs (health-promoting behaviors), HPLP (Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile), MS (Multiple sclerosis)

      1. Introduction

      Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (
      • Lassmann H.
      Multiple sclerosis pathology and its reflection by imaging technologies: introduction.
      ) with a global prevalence of 35.9 per 100,000 people in 2020 (
      • Walton C.
      • King R.
      • Rechtman L.
      • Kaye W.
      • Leray E.
      • Marrie R.A.
      • et al.
      Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition.
      ) and about 80,000 registered patients in Iran (
      • Roozegar N.
      • Daneshjoo A.
      • Divkan B.
      Effect of eight weeks of TRX training on balance, fatigue, muscle strength, and speed in women with multiple sclerosis.
      ). As MS prognosis is unpredictable, it often affects an individual in years when they are expected to be healthy (
      • Dennison L.
      • McCloy Smith E.
      • Bradbury K.
      • Galea I.
      How do people with multiple sclerosis experience prognostic uncertainty and prognosis communication? A qualitative study.
      ). The disease and its long-term problems indicate the need for multidisciplinary services and importance of health promotion (
      • Soelberg Sorensen P.
      • Giovannoni G.
      • Montalban X.
      • Thalheim C.
      • Zaratin P.
      • Comi G.
      The multiple sclerosis care unit.
      ).
      Health-promoting behaviors (HPBs) have been recognized as an essential strategy for maintaining and promoting independence, health, and quality of life in people with chronic conditions (
      • Feng Z.
      • Cramm J.M.
      • Nieboer A.P.
      Social participation is an important health behaviour for health and quality of life among chronically ill older Chinese people.
      ). On the other hand, chronic conditions are associated with decrease in HPBs in patients with MS (
      • Borghi M.
      • Bonino S.
      • Graziano F.
      • Calandri E.
      Exploring change in a group-based psychological intervention for multiple sclerosis patients.
      ). People can maintain and control health with HPBs, a kind of planning and function performed to prevent disease, improve health, increase productivity, and prevent negative consequences (
      • Edington D.W.
      • Schultz A.B.
      • Pitts J.S.
      • Camilleri A.
      The future of health promotion in the 21st century: a focus on the working population.
      ).
      • Jeon Y.J.
      • Pyo J.
      • Park Y.K.
      • Ock M.
      Health behaviors in major chronic diseases patients: trends and regional variations analysis, 2008-2017, Korea.
      reported that patients with chronic diseases showed worse health behaviors than normal people.
      • Saadat S.
      • Kalantari M.
      • Kajbaf M.B.
      • Hosseininezhad M.
      A comparative study of health promoting behaviors in healthy individuals and patients with multiple sclerosis: an analytical study.
      also found lower levels of HPBs in patients with MS than healthy people. Also,
      • Li X.
      • Gao Q.
      • Sun L.
      • Gao W.
      Effect of self-control on health promotion behavior in patients with coronary heart disease: mediating effect of ego-depletion.
      reported moderate level of HPBs in patients with chronic conditions.
      Patients with MS need personalized and organized treatment plans, which delay progression of disease and empower them for self-care (
      • Fraser R.
      • Ehde D.
      • Amtmann D.
      • Verrall A.
      • Johnson K.L.
      • Johnson E.
      • et al.
      Self-management for people with multiple sclerosis: report from the first international consensus conference, november 15, 2010.
      ). These plans include relaxation and coordination exercises in physical, sensory, motor, and mental functions, which are highly recommended (

      Kubsik-Gidlewska A.M., Klimkiewicz P., Klimkiewicz R., Janczewska K., Woldańska-Okońska M. Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Advances in clinical and experimental medicine: official organ Wroclaw Medical University. 2017; 26(4):709–15. 10.17219/acem/62329. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28691412/.

      ). During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth is considered an essential tool in protecting patients and healthcare providers by reducing person-to-person contact and thus slowing down COVID-19 transmission (
      • Monaghesh E.
      • Hajizadeh A.
      The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence.
      ).
      Telenursing technology is defined as a means of increasing support in self-care and regulating patient access to healthcare services anytime and anywhere (
      • Balenton N.
      • Chiappelli F.
      Telenursing: bioinformation cornerstone in Healthcare for the 21st Century.
      ). This technology allows changing care from hospital-centered to community-centered and from care-centered to client-centered (
      • Rouleau G.
      • Gagnon M.P.
      • Côté J.
      Impacts of information and communication technologies on nursing care: an overview of systematic reviews (protocol).
      ).
      • Moriyama M.
      • Kazawa K.
      • Jahan Y.
      • Ikeda M.
      • Mizukawa M.
      • Fukuoka Y.
      • et al.
      The Effectiveness of Telenursing for Self-Management Education on Cardiometabolic Conditions: a Pilot Project on a Remote Island of Ōsakikamijima, Japan.
      emphasized that telenursing could improve lifestyle-related behaviors in chronic diseases and manage cardiovascular conditions.
      • Motl R.
      • Ehde D.
      • Shinto L.
      • Fernhall B.
      • LaRocca N.
      • Zackowski K.
      Health behaviors, wellness, and multiple sclerosis amid COVID-19.
      suggested rapid transmission and coverage of telepsychology services (both video and telephone) in patients with MS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore,
      • Kotsani K.
      • Antonopoulou V.
      • Kountouri A.
      • Grammatiki M.
      • Rapti E.
      • Karras S.
      • et al.
      The role of telenursing in the management of Diabetes Type 1: a randomized controlled trial.
      found that telenursing in chronic conditions could motivate patients for self-care more than routine care in the clinic.
      • Piscesiana E.
      • Afriyani T.
      The effect of tele-nursing on preventing re-admission among patients with heart failure: a literature review.
      suggested helping assisting self-management in patients with chronic conditions in outlying areas as another benefit of telenursing. In the past, educational programs and continuous telephone follow-up led to increased awareness, health behavior promotion, and self-care (
      • Domingues F.B.
      • Clausell N.
      • Aliti G.B.
      • Dominguez D.R.
      • Rabelo E.R.
      Education and telephone monitoring by nurses of patients with heart failure: randomized clinical trial.
      ), but poor self-care behaviors were reported in MS patients (
      • Habibi H.
      • Sedighi B.
      • Jahani Y.
      • Hasani M.
      • Iranpour A.
      Self-care practices and related factors in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) based on the health belief model.
      ).
      The positive effects of telenursing have been reported in chronic diseases, and this technology has reduced both hospitalizations and nursing home visits to chronically ill patients in recent years. However, a standard method has not yet been developed for telenursing (
      • Elgaphar S.
      • El Gafar S.
      Effect of tele-nursing (phone-based follow-ups) on self-efficacy, healthy lifestyle, and glycemic control in diabetic patients.
      ). Therefore, teletherapy methods are essential in the recovery course of chronic diseases (e.g., MS) and can reduce costs and the patient's need for continuous access to medical centers. Although counseling and telenursing are easy and cost-effective methods, little research has been conducted in Iran. On the other hand, the COVID-19 crisis and its global spread can provide an opportunity for using tele-education for patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of self-care education with telenursing approach on HPBs in patients with MS.

      2. Methods

      2.1 Study design

      This clinical trial study (IRCT20201112049367N1) was conducted on patients with MS in Jahrom, southern Iran.

      2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

      Inclusion criteria were willingness to participate, definitive MS diagnosis, age range 18–50 years, media literacy, having MS for at least two years, ability of self-care, access to mobile phone, and using WhatsApp application. Exclusion criteria included withdrawal from the study for any reason, inability to implement theself-care program due to the disease, being in the exacerbation phase of the disease during the intervention, disease recurrence for at least the last six weeks, having other acute diseases such as heart, kidney, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and metabolic diseases, and being absent for more than two educational sessions.

      2.3 Sample size and sampling method

      The sample size was calculated after the intervention in the intervention (129 ± 18.9) and control (144.6 ± 15.9) groups, assuming a type one error of 0.05 and a power of 80% according to
      • Borzou S.R.
      • Zonoori S.
      • Falahinia G.H.
      • Soltanian A.R.
      The effect of education of health-promoting behaviors on lifestyle in hemodialysis patients.
      by the following formula:
      isconfirmed.


      A sample size of 30 individuals was initially calculated for both groups, and the final sample size in each group was increased to 35 people considering the possible dropout of subjects, resulting in a total of 70 subjects.
      Patients were selected using simple random sampling method. The list of patients with MS was prepared from the MS Society of Jahrom. According to the inclusion criteria and based on patients' willingness for participation, they were individually assigned a code that was randomly selected using Excel software and random production of data. The selected patients were then assigned a code written on a card that was placed inside the box. Then, the cards were taken out individually, and the patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 25) and control (n = 35) groups using the random allocation software (
      • Saghaei M.
      Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials.
      ). In this single-blind study, the participants were unaware of patients in the intervention and control groups (Fig. 1).

      2.4 Study instrument

      Data were collected using a demographic information questionnaire (containing information about age, gender, education level, occupation, marital status, disease duration, and number of hospitalization) and Walker's Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP).
      The main instrument of the study is Walker et al.’s HPLP (1987), the English version, which consists of 52 items answered using a 4-point scale (never = 1, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, and 4 = usually). This instrument measures HPBs in six dimensions, including nutrition (9 questions), exercise (8 questions), health responsibility (9 questions), stress management (8 questions), interpersonal relationships (9 questions), and self-actualization (9 questions) (
      • Walker S.
      • Hill-Polerecky
      Psychometric Evaluation of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II.
      ). In this questionnaire, higher scores indicate higher health-promoting styles. The validity and reliability of the scale was confirmed in Iran (
      • Morovvati Sharifabad M.
      • Ghofranipour F.
      • Heidarnia A.
      • Babaei Ruchi G.
      Perceived religion support of health promoting behaviors and health promoting behavior status among elderly (65 years and above) in Yazd, Iran.
      ).

      2.5 Educational intervention

      The content of educational intervention was the following:
      At the end of the study, educational materials were implemented for the control group through WhatsApp software in six weeks.

      2.6 Implementation process

      The researcher received a written approval letter from Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (JUMS), went to the MS Society, and obtained patients’ phone numbers (with the coordination of the head of the institute) to receive electronic consent forms from patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Also, the patients were fully explained about the study's objectives and were ensured that non-participation in the study or withdrawal from the study would not disrupt their treatment process. Patients in both intervention and control groups received and completed the questionnaires electronically. Then, the educational intervention was performed three days a week on Saturdays (8–10 am by sending multimedia content to the groups through WhatsApp software), Mondays (education for each patient for 10–15 min through phone calls by the researcher from 8 am to 8 pm), and Wednesdays (evaluation of the patients through phone calls for 10–15 min by the researcher from 8 am to 4 pm) for six weeks. The patients could also call the researcher for 10–15 min from 8 am to 8 pm on weekdays if they felt the need for telephone counseling. Each week the researcher had to make sure that all the patients received the educational content. If WhatsApp software indicated that a patient did not receive the information, the researcher would contact the patient to ask the reason, and the information would be sent to the patient, if necessary. At the end of the six weeks, patients in the intervention and control groups completed HPLP electronically.

      2.7 Data analysis

      The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 21. The Shapiro-Wilk test examined the normal distribution of data in the study groups. Due to the non-normality of the data, inter- and intra-group comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests at a significance level of 0.05.

      2.8 Ethical approval

      This study was approved by the ethics committee of JUMS (IR.JUMS.REC.1399.142). All the participants signed written informed consent forms. In addition, they were explained about the study objectives and sufficiently ensured about the confidentiality of their information.

      3. Results

      Patients with MS in the intervention (n = 34) and control (n = 34) groups participated in this study. One subject in each group was excluded from the study as they failed to complete the questionnaire immediately after the intervention. The Chi-square test results indicated that the control and intervention groups were similar in terms of demographic and contextual variables (Table 1). Based on the Shapiro-Wilk test results, the HPB has not a normal distribution. Therefore, the data were analyzed using non-parametric tests.
      Table 1Frequency of demographic and clinical variables in the control and intervention groups.
      Intervention group (n = 34)Control group(n = 34)p-value
      Frequency (%)Frequency (%)0.493
      GenderMale(11.8)4(17.6)6X2
      Female(88.2)30(82.4)28
      Marital statusSingle(23.5)8(14.7)50.622

      X2
      Married(73.5)25(79.4)27
      Divorced/widowed(0.0)0(5.8)2
      EducationDropout(26.5)9(32.4)110.543

      X2
      Diploma(32.4)11(20.6)7
      Academic(41.2)14(47.1)16
      Disease recurrence in the last yearNo recurrence(61.8)21(55.9)190.663

      X2
      Once(23.5)8(23.5)8
      Twice(8.8)3(5.9)2
      More(5.9)2(14.7)5
      Hospitalizations in the last yearNo hospitalization(61.8)21(47.1)160.504

      X2
      Once(23.5)8(38.2)13
      Twice(8.8)3(11.8)4
      More(5.9)2(2.9)1
      OccupationUnemployed(14.7)5(5.9)20.380

      X2
      Housewife(55.9)19(67.6)23
      Student(5.9)2(0.0)0
      Other occupations(14.7)5(20.6)7
      Employee(8.8)3(5.9)2
      Income adequacyInadequate(41.2)14(47.1)160.071

      X2
      Somewhat adequate(55.9)19(35.3)12
      Fully adequate(2.9)1(17.6)6
      Mean ± SDMean ± SD
      Age (year)8.03± 37.248.29± 34.910.245

      Ind. t-test
      BMI4.99± 25.446.73± 25.070.99

      Mann-Whitney
      Disease duration5.84± 9.094.49± 6.740.074

      Mann-Whitney
      The results of the Wilcoxon test revealed that the mean score of HPBs increased significantly in the intervention group after the intervention (145.38 ± 26.66) compared to before the intervention (119.21 ± 22.45) (p = 0.001). However, this increase after the intervention was not significant in the control group (p = 0.521) (Table 2).
      Table 2Comparison of health-promoting behaviors in MS patients between the intervention and control groups before and immediately after intervention.
      VariableTimeIntervention groupControl groupp-valueTest
      MeanSDMeanSD
      Health-promoting behaviorsBefore the intervention119.2122.45126.0022.690.219Ind. t-test
      Immediately after intervention145.3826.66129.1822.350.005Mann-Whitney
      p-value0.0010.521
      NutritionBefore the intervention21.444.0221.504.340.954Mann-Whitney
      Immediately after intervention24.684.2419.683.820.001Mann-Whitney
      p-value0.0020.051
      ExerciseBefore intervention12.855.0014.183.620.072Mann-Whitney
      Immediately after intervention19.767.1216.325.600.029Mann-Whitney
      p-value0.0010.066
      Health responsibilityBefore intervention21.005.3421.446.710.765Mann-Whitney
      Immediately after intervention25.595.8822.006.620.016Mann-Whitney
      p-value0.0010.787
      Stress managementBefore intervention17.764.8418.975.160.287Mann-Whitney
      Immediately after intervention22.154.8319.764.770.025Mann-Whitney
      p-value0.0010.341
      Interpersonal relationshipsBefore intervention23.185.0724.535.020.273Mann-Whitney
      Immediately after intervention26.765.0625.064.820.081Mann-Whitney
      p-value0.0010.738
      Self-actualizationBefore intervention22.975.4125.155.510.105Mann-Whitney
      Immediately after intervention26.444.8626.354.970.749Mann-Whitney
      p-value0.0030.261
      The Mann-Whitney test results showed a significant difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of HPBs mean (p < 0.05), immediately after the intervention but not before the intervention (p > 0.05). This result showed that the mean of HPBs was significantly higher in the intervention group (145.26 ± 38.66) than the control group (129.18 ± 22.35) (p = 0.005) immediately after the intervention (Table 2).
      Immediately after the intervention, the intervention and control groups were significantly different in terms of dimensions of HPBs (nutrition, exercise, health responsibility, and stress management) (p < 0.05). The means of these dimensions were significantly higher in the intervention group than the control group. However, the means of interpersonal relationships and self-actualization in patients with MS were not significantly different between the intervention and control groups (p < 0.05) (Table 2).

      4. Discussion

      Self-management education includes knowledge, ideas, self-regulatory behaviors, and ability to manage chronic conditions and implementing health behaviors (
      • da Mota Gomes M.
      • Navarro T.
      • Keepanasseril A.
      • Jeffery R.
      • Haynes R.B.
      Increasing adherence to treatment in epilepsy: what do the strongest trials show?.
      ). The results of this study demonstrated that education of self-care using telenursing could improve HPBs in MS patients.
      Evidence indicates that intervention programs have effectively improved HPBs in patients with different diseases (
      • Dashti A.
      • Yousefi H.
      • Maghsoudi J.
      • Etemadifar M.
      The effects of motivational interviewing on health promoting behaviors of patients with multiple sclerosis.
      ;
      • Shahsavani A.
      • Kiani F.
      Investigating the effect of telenursing on health promoting behaviours of haemodialysis patients in education hospitals in Zahedan in 2017-2018.
      ); however, such programs have less been implemented in patients with
      • Shahsavani A.
      • Kiani F.
      Investigating the effect of telenursing on health promoting behaviours of haemodialysis patients in education hospitals in Zahedan in 2017-2018.
      reported that educational intervention about dialysis diet could improve health behaviors in patients under dialysis. In a study on cancer patients, nursing interventions affected health promoting behaviors in cases that included health education and encouragement of change (
      • Peixoto N.M.D.S.M.
      • Peixoto T.A.D.S.M.
      • Pinto C.A.S.
      • Santos C.S.V.B.
      Nursing intervention focusing on health promotion behaviors in adult cancer patients: a scoping review.
      ).
      • Moriyama M.
      • Kazawa K.
      • Jahan Y.
      • Ikeda M.
      • Mizukawa M.
      • Fukuoka Y.
      • et al.
      The Effectiveness of Telenursing for Self-Management Education on Cardiometabolic Conditions: a Pilot Project on a Remote Island of Ōsakikamijima, Japan.
      in a study on islanders in Japan reported that most behavioral changes, such as self-management behaviors, cardiovascular indices, and self-efficacy, were significantly improved using telenursing. They used face-to-face health education in the initial interview, followed by telephone education (two-week calls to the third month and monthly telephone calls in the fourth and fifth months) by trained nurses outside the island (
      • Moriyama M.
      • Kazawa K.
      • Jahan Y.
      • Ikeda M.
      • Mizukawa M.
      • Fukuoka Y.
      • et al.
      The Effectiveness of Telenursing for Self-Management Education on Cardiometabolic Conditions: a Pilot Project on a Remote Island of Ōsakikamijima, Japan.
      ).
      • Li X.
      • Gao Q.
      • Sun L.
      • Gao W.
      Effect of self-control on health promotion behavior in patients with coronary heart disease: mediating effect of ego-depletion.
      found that self-control, ability for self-regulation, improved patients' HPBs.
      • Sato D.
      Effectiveness of telenursing for postoperative complications in patients with prostate cancer.
      found management of postoperative symptoms and complications, as another benefit of telenursing, could be effective in patients with prostate cancer.
      Contrary to our results,
      • Khosravan S.
      • Alami A.
      • Mansoorian M.R.
      • Kamali M.
      The effect of intervention based on pender's model of health-promoting self-care behaviors in women who are the head of their household.
      found that educational-supportive intervention was only effective in the physical dimension of HPBs. A reason for this discrepancy can be poor levels of HPBs in female heads of households. Other reasons include low education levels of these women and their vulnerability compared to other women. In the present study, approximately half of the participants had academic education.
      In a study by
      • Farsi Z.
      • Chehri M.
      • Zareiyan A.
      • Soltannezhad F.
      The effect of a caring program based on Pender's Model on health promoting behaviors and self-care in patients with heart failure: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.
      , a face-to-face care intervention program based on Pender's model promoted HPBs in all dimensions except for self-actualization, which is in line with the present study findings concerning the non-significant self-actualization dimension. It seems that it is more difficult to change this dimension than the other dimensions, and implementing a care program based on Pender's model probably was not sufficient to make a change in this dimension.
      In the current study, improvements were observed in the dimensions of nutrition, exercise, health responsibility, and stress management, but patients with MS were not significantly different in the means of interpersonal relationships and self-actualization.
      • Dashti A.
      • Yousefi H.
      • Maghsoudi J.
      • Etemadifar M.
      The effects of motivational interviewing on health promoting behaviors of patients with multiple sclerosis.
      claimed the effectiveness of motivational interviews on HPB and its dimensions, except for self-actualization, in MS patients, which might be due to the presence of patients in motivational interview sessions that exacerbated their anxiety and interfered with the intervention results.
      • Dehdari T.
      • Rahimi T.
      • Aryaeian N.
      • Gohari M.R.
      Effect of nutrition education intervention based on Pender's Health Promotion Model in improving the frequency and nutrient intake of breakfast consumption among female Iranian students.
      presented evidence that an intervention based on Pender's model could improve Iranian students' consumption of nutrients.
      • Shahsavani A.
      • Kiani F.
      Investigating the effect of telenursing on health promoting behaviours of haemodialysis patients in education hospitals in Zahedan in 2017-2018.
      study on hemodialysis patients showed an improvement in adherence to diet through patient education and telephone follow-up (telenursing).
      • Zheng X.
      • Yu H.
      • Qiu X.
      • Chair S.Y.
      • Wong E.M.L.
      • Wang Q.
      The effects of a nurse-led lifestyle intervention program on cardiovascular risk, self-efficacy and health promoting behaviours among patients with metabolic syndrome: randomized controlled trial.
      reported that a combination of face-to-face education and quarterly telephone follow-up could improve self-efficacy for nutrition, stress dimension, and the total score of HPBs. In the present study, the majority of patients had apparently a moderate income level, and they could afford life expenses, including nutrition. The present study is consistent with those of
      • Farsi Z.
      • Chehri M.
      • Zareiyan A.
      • Soltannezhad F.
      The effect of a caring program based on Pender's Model on health promoting behaviors and self-care in patients with heart failure: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.
      and
      • Noroozi A.
      • Tahmasebi R.
      • Ghofranipour F.
      • Hydarnia A.
      Effect of Health Promotion Model (HPM) based education on physical activity in diabetic women.
      regarding improvements in health responsibility and exercise/physical activity, respectively. In the present study, education of self-care could effectively improve stress management in MS patients, which is in line with
      • Zheng X.
      • Yu H.
      • Qiu X.
      • Chair S.Y.
      • Wong E.M.L.
      • Wang Q.
      The effects of a nurse-led lifestyle intervention program on cardiovascular risk, self-efficacy and health promoting behaviours among patients with metabolic syndrome: randomized controlled trial.
      study.
      Our findings revealed that education of self-care was not effective on the interpersonal relationship and self-actualization of the MS patients.
      • Shahsavani A.
      • Kiani F.
      Investigating the effect of telenursing on health promoting behaviours of haemodialysis patients in education hospitals in Zahedan in 2017-2018.
      , on the other hand, found that implementing a care program based on Pender's model increased HPBs in interpersonal relationships in patients with chronic heart failure. This inconsistency can be explained by differences in the research population and patients’ lifestyles.
      It seems that self-care education with telenursing approach can be an appropriate option to improve educational process in MS patients (
      • Khan F.
      • Amatya B.
      • Kesselring J.
      • Galea M.
      Telerehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis.
      ). Face-to-face self-care education is more expensive and time-consuming than telenursing, as the patient may not refer for follow-up sessions. It should be noted based on the current study results that telenursing was more effective during the intervention (
      • Shahsavani A.
      • Kiani F.
      Investigating the effect of telenursing on health promoting behaviours of haemodialysis patients in education hospitals in Zahedan in 2017-2018.
      ). Another strength of this study is implementation of telenursing during the COVID-19 pandemic, which can eliminate meetings and face-to-face sessions so that patients can receive necessary education electronically and remotely. In the COVID-19 epidemic, a change in the conventional management of patients, particularly those with chronic diseases such as MS, is considered necessary, and telemedicine is introduced as a valid alternative to face-to-face appointments; recommendations are available for using telemedicine in the management of MS patients (
      • Cerqueira J.J.
      • Ladeira A.F.
      • Silva A.M.
      • Timóteo Â.
      • Vale J.
      • Sousa L.
      • et al.
      Multiple sclerosis patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic: practical recommendations from the portuguese multiple sclerosis study group (GEEM).
      ). Telenursing increases immunity and reduces the risk of infection in patients with chronic diseases, particularly MS patients, who have underlying diseases and are at high risk for COVID-19, thereby preventing infection and the spread and transmission of the virus (
      • Kord Z.
      • Fereidouni Z.
      • Mirzaee M.S.
      • Alizadeh Z.
      • Behnammoghadam M.
      • Rezaei M.
      • et al.
      Telenursing home care and COVID-19: a qualitative study.
      ).
      There were also limitations in this study, including the use of a questionnaire, as it is not known to what extent the questionnaire results could be consistent with real and practical behaviors. Moreover, individual differences of the subjects could probably influence the learning level, the proper implementation of the proposed programs, and, ultimately, the research outcome.

      5. Conclusion

      Findings of this study indicate that self-care education with the telenursing approach can influence HPBs in MS patients. It can be beneficial to be used as an educative-supportive method in MS patients. The telenursing can also increase the immunity of patients during the COVID-19 outbreak by eliminating face-to-face visits and person-to-person contact. Therefore, it is recommended to use telenursing approach for education and improvement of another health dimension such as quality of life.

      Role of funding source

      This research was supported by the research department of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences.

      Declaration of Competing Interest

      There were no conflicts of interest in this study.

      Acknowledgments

      This article was extracted from a master's thesis in nursing with the financial support of JUMS. The study was approved by the ethics committee of JUMS (IR.JUMS.REC.1399.142). The authors are grateful to the MS Society of Jahrom City and those participating in the study.

      References

        • Lassmann H.
        Multiple sclerosis pathology and its reflection by imaging technologies: introduction.
        Brain Pathol. 2018; 28: 721https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12649
        • Walton C.
        • King R.
        • Rechtman L.
        • Kaye W.
        • Leray E.
        • Marrie R.A.
        • et al.
        Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition.
        Mult. Scler. 2020; 26 (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)Available from:: 1816-1821https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458520970841
        • Roozegar N.
        • Daneshjoo A.
        • Divkan B.
        Effect of eight weeks of TRX training on balance, fatigue, muscle strength, and speed in women with multiple sclerosis.
        Sci. J. Rehabil. Med. 2020; 9 (Available from:): 63-73https://doi.org/10.22037/jrm.2019.111468.2014
        • Dennison L.
        • McCloy Smith E.
        • Bradbury K.
        • Galea I.
        How do people with multiple sclerosis experience prognostic uncertainty and prognosis communication? A qualitative study.
        PLoS ONE. 2016; 11 (Available from:)e0158982https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158982
        • Soelberg Sorensen P.
        • Giovannoni G.
        • Montalban X.
        • Thalheim C.
        • Zaratin P.
        • Comi G.
        The multiple sclerosis care unit.
        Mult. Scler. 2019; 25 (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)Available from:: 627-636https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518807082
        • Feng Z.
        • Cramm J.M.
        • Nieboer A.P.
        Social participation is an important health behaviour for health and quality of life among chronically ill older Chinese people.
        BMC Geriatr. 2020; 20 (Available from:): 299https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01713-6
        • Borghi M.
        • Bonino S.
        • Graziano F.
        • Calandri E.
        Exploring change in a group-based psychological intervention for multiple sclerosis patients.
        Disabil. Rehabil. 2018; 40 (Available from:): 1671-1678https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1306588
        • Edington D.W.
        • Schultz A.B.
        • Pitts J.S.
        • Camilleri A.
        The future of health promotion in the 21st century: a focus on the working population.
        Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2016; 10 (Available from:): 242-252https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827615605789
        • Jeon Y.J.
        • Pyo J.
        • Park Y.K.
        • Ock M.
        Health behaviors in major chronic diseases patients: trends and regional variations analysis, 2008-2017, Korea.
        BMC Public Health. 2020; 20 (Available from:): 1813https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09940-7
        • Saadat S.
        • Kalantari M.
        • Kajbaf M.B.
        • Hosseininezhad M.
        A comparative study of health promoting behaviors in healthy individuals and patients with multiple sclerosis: an analytical study.
        Hayat. 2019; 25 (Available from:): 138-150
        • Li X.
        • Gao Q.
        • Sun L.
        • Gao W.
        Effect of self-control on health promotion behavior in patients with coronary heart disease: mediating effect of ego-depletion.
        Psychol. Health Med. 2021; ([eng]Available from:): 1-9https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1867316
        • Fraser R.
        • Ehde D.
        • Amtmann D.
        • Verrall A.
        • Johnson K.L.
        • Johnson E.
        • et al.
        Self-management for people with multiple sclerosis: report from the first international consensus conference, november 15, 2010.
        Int. J. MS Care. 2013; 15 (Available from:): 99-106https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2012-044
      1. Kubsik-Gidlewska A.M., Klimkiewicz P., Klimkiewicz R., Janczewska K., Woldańska-Okońska M. Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Advances in clinical and experimental medicine: official organ Wroclaw Medical University. 2017; 26(4):709–15. 10.17219/acem/62329. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28691412/.

        • Monaghesh E.
        • Hajizadeh A.
        The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence.
        BMC Public Health. 2020; 20 (Available from:): 1-9https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4
        • Balenton N.
        • Chiappelli F.
        Telenursing: bioinformation cornerstone in Healthcare for the 21st Century.
        Bioinformation. 2017; 13 (Available from:): 412-414https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630013412
        • Rouleau G.
        • Gagnon M.P.
        • Côté J.
        Impacts of information and communication technologies on nursing care: an overview of systematic reviews (protocol).
        Syst. Rev. 2015; 4 (Available from:): 75https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0062-y
        • Moriyama M.
        • Kazawa K.
        • Jahan Y.
        • Ikeda M.
        • Mizukawa M.
        • Fukuoka Y.
        • et al.
        The Effectiveness of Telenursing for Self-Management Education on Cardiometabolic Conditions: a Pilot Project on a Remote Island of Ōsakikamijima, Japan.
        J. Prime Care Community Health. 2021; 1221501327211030817https://doi.org/10.1177/21501327211030817
        • Motl R.
        • Ehde D.
        • Shinto L.
        • Fernhall B.
        • LaRocca N.
        • Zackowski K.
        Health behaviors, wellness, and multiple sclerosis amid COVID-19.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2020; 101 ([eng]): 1839-1841https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.001
        • Kotsani K.
        • Antonopoulou V.
        • Kountouri A.
        • Grammatiki M.
        • Rapti E.
        • Karras S.
        • et al.
        The role of telenursing in the management of Diabetes Type 1: a randomized controlled trial.
        Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2018; 80: 29-35https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.01.003
        • Piscesiana E.
        • Afriyani T.
        The effect of tele-nursing on preventing re-admission among patients with heart failure: a literature review.
        Int. J. Nurs. Health Serv. (IJNHS). 2020; 3: 251-260
        • Domingues F.B.
        • Clausell N.
        • Aliti G.B.
        • Dominguez D.R.
        • Rabelo E.R.
        Education and telephone monitoring by nurses of patients with heart failure: randomized clinical trial.
        Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2011; 96 (Available from:): 233-239https://doi.org/10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000014
        • Habibi H.
        • Sedighi B.
        • Jahani Y.
        • Hasani M.
        • Iranpour A.
        Self-care practices and related factors in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) based on the health belief model.
        J. Caring Sci. 2021; 10 (Available from:): 77-83https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2021.015
        • Elgaphar S.
        • El Gafar S.
        Effect of tele-nursing (phone-based follow-ups) on self-efficacy, healthy lifestyle, and glycemic control in diabetic patients.
        J. Nurs. Health Sci. 2017; 6: 67-76
        • Borzou S.R.
        • Zonoori S.
        • Falahinia G.H.
        • Soltanian A.R.
        The effect of education of health-promoting behaviors on lifestyle in hemodialysis patients.
        Int. J. Med. Res. Health Sci. 2016; 5: 214-220
        • Saghaei M.
        Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials.
        BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2004; 4 (Available from: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-26): 26https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-26
        • Walker S.
        • Hill-Polerecky
        Psychometric Evaluation of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II.
        University of Nebraska Medical Center, 1996: 120-126 (Unpublished manuscript13)
        • Morovvati Sharifabad M.
        • Ghofranipour F.
        • Heidarnia A.
        • Babaei Ruchi G.
        Perceived religion support of health promoting behaviors and health promoting behavior status among elderly (65 years and above) in Yazd, Iran.
        J. Shahid Sadoughi Univ. Med. Sci. Health Serv. 2004; 12: 23-29
        • Hinkle J.L.
        • Cheever K.H.
        Brunner and Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing.
        Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd, 2018
        • Donze C.
        • Massot C.
        • Hautecoeur P.
        • Cattoir-Vue H.
        • Guyot M.A.
        The practice of sport in multiple sclerosis: update.
        Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2017; 16 (Available from:): 274-279https://doi.org/10.1249/jsr.0000000000000374
        • Wikler D.
        Personal and social responsibility for health.
        J. Ethics Int. Aff. 2002; 16 (Available from:): 47-55
        • Fath Ali Lavasani F.
        Stress management.
        Addiction MHa. Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran2015 (editor.)
        • Maltz M.
        Psycho-Cybernetics & Self-Fulfillment.
        1st ed. Grosset & Dunlap, 2020
        • da Mota Gomes M.
        • Navarro T.
        • Keepanasseril A.
        • Jeffery R.
        • Haynes R.B.
        Increasing adherence to treatment in epilepsy: what do the strongest trials show?.
        Acta Neurol. Scand. 2017; 135 (Available from:): 266-272https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12668
        • Dashti A.
        • Yousefi H.
        • Maghsoudi J.
        • Etemadifar M.
        The effects of motivational interviewing on health promoting behaviors of patients with multiple sclerosis.
        Iran. J. Nurs. Midwifery Res. 2016; 21 (Available from:): 640-645https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.197682
        • Shahsavani A.
        • Kiani F.
        Investigating the effect of telenursing on health promoting behaviours of haemodialysis patients in education hospitals in Zahedan in 2017-2018.
        J. Evol. Med. Dent. Sci. 2019; 8: 3326-3332
        • Peixoto N.M.D.S.M.
        • Peixoto T.A.D.S.M.
        • Pinto C.A.S.
        • Santos C.S.V.B.
        Nursing intervention focusing on health promotion behaviors in adult cancer patients: a scoping review.
        Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2021; 55 (Available from:)
        • Sato D.
        Effectiveness of telenursing for postoperative complications in patients with prostate cancer.
        Asia-Pac. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2020; 7 (Available from:): 396-403https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_28_20
        • Khosravan S.
        • Alami A.
        • Mansoorian M.R.
        • Kamali M.
        The effect of intervention based on pender's model of health-promoting self-care behaviors in women who are the head of their household.
        Nurs. Midwifery Stud. 2016; 5: e37253
        • Farsi Z.
        • Chehri M.
        • Zareiyan A.
        • Soltannezhad F.
        The effect of a caring program based on Pender's Model on health promoting behaviors and self-care in patients with heart failure: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.
        Hayat. 2019; 25 (Available from:): 106-123
        • Dehdari T.
        • Rahimi T.
        • Aryaeian N.
        • Gohari M.R.
        Effect of nutrition education intervention based on Pender's Health Promotion Model in improving the frequency and nutrient intake of breakfast consumption among female Iranian students.
        Public Health Nutr. 2014; 17 (Available from:): 657-666
        • Zheng X.
        • Yu H.
        • Qiu X.
        • Chair S.Y.
        • Wong E.M.L.
        • Wang Q.
        The effects of a nurse-led lifestyle intervention program on cardiovascular risk, self-efficacy and health promoting behaviours among patients with metabolic syndrome: randomized controlled trial.
        Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2020; 109 (Available from:)103638https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103638
        • Noroozi A.
        • Tahmasebi R.
        • Ghofranipour F.
        • Hydarnia A.
        Effect of Health Promotion Model (HPM) based education on physical activity in diabetic women.
        Iran. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011; 13 (Available from:): 361-367
        • Khan F.
        • Amatya B.
        • Kesselring J.
        • Galea M.
        Telerehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; 2015 (Available from:)Cd010508https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010508.pub2
        • Cerqueira J.J.
        • Ladeira A.F.
        • Silva A.M.
        • Timóteo Â.
        • Vale J.
        • Sousa L.
        • et al.
        Multiple sclerosis patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic: practical recommendations from the portuguese multiple sclerosis study group (GEEM).
        Front. Neurol. 2021; 12 ([eng]Available from:)613769https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.613769
        • Kord Z.
        • Fereidouni Z.
        • Mirzaee M.S.
        • Alizadeh Z.
        • Behnammoghadam M.
        • Rezaei M.
        • et al.
        Telenursing home care and COVID-19: a qualitative study.
        BMJ Support. Palliat. Care. 2021; (bmjspcare-2021-003001Available from:)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003001