If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Few exercise studies are undertaken in young and old people with multiple sclerosis.
•
Exercise is mostly studied in mild to moderate disabled people with multiple sclerosis.
•
The applied exercise modalities are predominantly endurance or combined exercise.
Abstract
Background
Exercise is a cornerstone in rehabilitation of persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), which is known to elicit beneficial effects on various symptoms and to have a potential disease-modifying effect. However, it remains to be elucidated if the existing MS exercise literature covers the full age and disability span of pwMS.
Objective
To systematically review MS exercise studies and provide a detailed mapping of the demographic and clinical characteristics of the included pwMS.
Methods
A systematic review of MS exercise studies were performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE. From the resulting MS exercise studies, mean sample characteristics were extracted.
Results
4576 records were identified, from which 202 studies were included. Of these, 166 studies (82.2%) enrolled pwMS aged 35–54 years, 10.9% enrolled pwMS <35 years, and 6.9% enrolled pwMS ≥55 years (only 1.5% enrolled pwMS ≥60 years). A total of 118 studies (58.4%) reported Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), with 88.1% of included pwMS having an EDSS between 2.0 and 6.5, while only one study enrolled pwMS with an EDSS ≥7.0. Finally, 80% of the studies included pwMS having a disease duration of 5-14.5 years.
Conclusion
Exercise studies in pwMS included primarily middle-aged (35-54 years) pwMS having an EDSS of 2.0-6.5 and a disease duration of 5–14.5 years. Few exercise studies were identified in young and older pwMS, in pwMS with mild disability and severe disability, and in pwMS having shorter or longer disease durations. These findings highlight the need for further investigation of exercise in these specific subgroups of pwMS as benefits of exercise might not generalize across subpopulations.
Despite major advancements in medical treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) over the past 25 years, rehabilitation is still a cornerstone in MS treatment (
), defined as structured and planned physical activities. Several exercise modalities are known to effectively improve muscular strength and aerobic capacity as well as mobility, fatigue, mood, and quality of life, in persons with MS (pwMS) having mild to moderate disability (
Is aerobic or resistance training the most effective exercise modality for improving lower extremity physical function and perceived fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
). Furthermore, several studies have suggested that exercise might even postpone and slow down disease progression in MS thereby eliciting disease-modifying effects (
). Consequently, recent reviews from our group proposed to prescribe tailored exercise as "medicine" to pwMS alongside conventional medical treatment, already at an early disease stage (
). Exercise is therefore considered an essential element of MS rehabilitation.
Even though exercise is a cornerstone of MS rehabilitation, duration and type of exercise researched across different age groups and disability levels have not been extensively mapped. Such a mapping is central when aiming to identify relevant literature gaps and clarify limitations of the existing exercise recommendations (
), yet a comprehensive and systematic mapping of the MS populations enrolled in exercise studies is still pending in the existing literature.
Therefore, the primary objective of the present systematic review is to perform a detailed mapping of the existing MS exercise literature in terms of participant age and disability level, as well as to categorize the applied interventions and study types.
2. Methods
This review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guideline and preregistered at PROSPERO (CRD42022297563) (
). Paper screening was at all stages done independently by two reviewers (JJF and TG) using Covidence (Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia). Disagreement between the two reviewers was resolved by consensus, and a third reviewer (UD) was consulted if consensus could not be reached.
2.1 Definitions
Many previous reviews have applied the definition of exercise proposed by
, defining exercise as ”physical activity that is planned, structured, repetitive, and purposive in the sense that improvement or maintenance of one or more components of physical fitness is an objective” (
). As this definition implies that physical activity covers all activity where a person is not lying still, the following modification to Caspersen's definition of physical activity was made; “physical activity involves voluntary activation of the skeletal muscles, that results in movement of a body part in time and space”. Therefore, the following definition of exercise was applied in the present study: “Exercise involves voluntary activation of the skeletal muscles, that results in movement of a body part in time and space in addition to being planned, structured, repetitive, and purposive in the sense that improvement or maintenance of one or more components of physical fitness is an objective”.
2.2 Search
A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE on November 11th, 2021. The search was based on medical subject headings and included the (MeSH-) terms “exercise” OR “exercise therapy” (“Kinesiotherapy” in EMBASE) AND “multiple sclerosis” with a date range of year 1000 to November 11th, 2021.
2.3 Inclusion criteria
The included studies:
-
Had to evaluate one or more of the following exercise interventions (which broadly cover the exercise spectrum):
Body & Mind Exercise (incl. Pilates, yoga/Asian movement philosophies)
6
Others (including aquatic exercise, task-oriented exercise, and exergaming)
7
Combined exercise (a combination of one or more of the mentioned exercise modalities)
-
Were reported in peer-reviewed papers
-
Were published in English, Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, or German.
-
Had a description of the intervention that allowed characterization of the exercise modality and evaluated an exercise intervention where exercise constituted the main part of the intervention.
-
Had to apply one of the following designs: Randomized controlled trial (RCT), non-randomized controlled trial, intervention trial without control, or pilot RCT (i.e., RCTs specifically described as pilot studies by the authors).
2.4 Exclusion criteria
Studies were excluded if:
-
They evaluated acute exercise interventions or exercise interventions lasting < 2 weeks.
-
They were outside study design restrictions
-
They reported data from a study that was previously published (only the first published paper from a study was included).
-
Evaluated interventions outside the included exercise interventions, e.g., the following interventions:
○
Breathing exercises
○
Fine motor skill
○
Pelvic floor exercise/ Pubococcygeal exercise
○
Electro muscle stimulation
○
Vibration's exercise
○
Hippotherapy
○
Cognition-Targeted Exercise
○
Physiotherapy
○
Stretching
○
Tension and trauma-releasing exercises
○
Inpatient rehabilitation
-
They were lacking basic statistical information (e.g., means and SD)
It is acknowledged that exercise is a broad term, and several of the above-listed interventions could be argued to be considered exercise. However, according to our definition of exercise, these interventions are not considered an exercise in this work. “Breathing exercise”, “pelvic floor/pubococcygeal exercise”, “Electro muscle stimulation”, and “cognition-targeted exercises” are all examples of interventions where no voluntary activation of the skeletal muscles is performed or where no significant movement of a body part in time and space is undertaken.
2.5 Data extraction
After screening, data extraction from the included studies was performed, extracting information on study design, intervention type, duration of intervention, study sample, and baseline characteristics. The baseline characteristics extracted included age, gender, EDSS, height weight, body mass index (BMI), MS sub-type, and disease duration (i.e., time since diagnosis). After data extraction, all data points were checked to ensure data quality. In cases where studies only reported individual values, mean values and standard deviations were calculated. This was also done if only separate groups were reported. A subgrouping based on EDSS and time since diagnosis was made to evaluate the distribution of exercise studies across disability and disease duration. EDSS was divided into ≤1.5, 2.0-2.5, 3.0-3.5, 4.0-4.5, 5.0-5.5, 6.0-6.5, and ≥7.0. Where EDSS scores represented mild disability (EDSS 0-2.5), moderate disability (EDSS 3.0-4.5), severe disability (EDSS 5-6.5), and very severe disability (EDSS 7+) (
). Time since diagnosis was divided into groups spanning five years: 0–4.9 years, 5–9.9 years, 10–14.9 years, 15–19.9 years, and ≥20 years. Characteristics of each study included can be found in Table 1.
The effects of clinical Pilates training on walking, balance, fall risk, respiratory and cognitive functions in persons with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
The effects of 10-week core stability training on balance in women with multiple sclerosis according to expanded disability status scale: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Group-based, individualized, comprehensive core stability and balance intervention provides immediate and long-term improvements in walking in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Short-term interval aerobic exercise training does not improve memory functioning in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis – a randomized controlled trial.
How do resistance training and balance and motor control training affect gait performance and fatigue impact in people with multiple sclerosis? A randomized controlled multi-center study.
Pragmatic intervention for increasing self-directed exercise behaviour and improving important health outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial.
Fatigue, as measured using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, is a predictor of processing speed improvement induced by exercise in patients with multiple sclerosis: data from a randomized controlled trial.
12 weeks of combined endurance and resistance training reduces innate markers of inflammation in a randomized controlled clinical trial in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Progressive resistance training did not improve walking but can improve muscle performance, quality of life and fatigue in adults with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
The effect of aerobic exercise on Neurofilament light chain and glial Fibrillary acidic protein level in patients with relapsing remitting type multiple sclerosis.
Effects of an individual 12-week community-located “start-to-run” program on physical capacity, walking, fatigue, cognitive function, brain volumes, and structures in persons with multiple sclerosis.
Effects of pilates-based core stability training in ambulant people with multiple sclerosis: multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
Combined exercise training reduces IFN-γ and IL-17 levels in the plasma and the supernatant of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in women with multiple sclerosis.
Effects of high-intensity resistance training on strength, mobility, balance, and fatigue in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Effects of a home-based step training programme on balance, stepping, cognition and functional performance in people with multiple sclerosis – a randomized controlled trial.
Randomized controlled trial to examine the impact of aquatic exercise training on functional capacity, balance, and perceptions of fatigue in female patients with multiple sclerosis.
Neuromuscular adaptations to long-term progressive resistance training translates to improved functional capacity for people with multiple sclerosis and is maintained at follow-up.
Calling out MS fatigue: feasibility and preliminary effects of a pilot randomized telephone-delivered exercise intervention for multiple sclerosis fatigue.
Effect of aerobic interval training on serum IL-10, TNFα, and adipokines levels in women with multiple sclerosis: possible relations with fatigue and quality of life.
Monireh, M.N., Hossein, S., Fatemeh, H., 2012. Effects of selected combined training on balance and functional capacity in women with multiple sclerosis.
Effects of a short-term exercise training program on aerobic fitness, fatigue, health perception and activity level of subjects with multiple sclerosis.
Combined exercise training improves cognitive functions in multiple sclerosis patients with cognitive impairment: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Quantitative assessment of the effects of 6 months of adapted physical activity on gait in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
The effectiveness of whole-body cryotherapy and physical exercises on the psychological well-being of patients with multiple sclerosis: a comparative analysis.
Effect of aerobic training on walking capacity and maximal exercise tolerance in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized crossover controlled study.
The effects of exergaming on balance, gait, technology acceptance and flow experience in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Compared to an active control condition, in persons with multiple sclerosis two different types of exercise training improved sleep and depression, but not fatigue, paresthesia, and intolerance of uncertainty.
Effects of walking exercise training on learning and memory and hippocampal neuroimaging outcomes in MS: a targeted, pilot randomized controlled trial.
A combined exercise model for improving muscle strength, balance, walking distance, and motor agility in multiple sclerosis patients: a randomized clinical trial. Iran.
Effect of combination exercise therapy on walking distance, postural balance, fatigue and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients: a clinical trial study.
Impact of aerobic exercise on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in persons with multiple sclerosis: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.
Comparing the effects of vestibular rehabilitation with and without lavender oil scents as an olfactory stimulus on balance, fear of falling down and activities of daily living of people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial.
Robot-assisted gait training is not superior to intensive overground walking in multiple sclerosis with severe disability (the RAGTIME study): a randomized controlled trial.
Mii-vitaliSe: a pilot randomised controlled trial of a home gaming system (Nintendo Wii) to increase activity levels, vitality and well-being in people with multiple sclerosis.
Vestibular rehabilitation has positive effects on balance, fatigue and activities of daily living in highly disabled multiple sclerosis people: A preliminary randomized controlled trial.
Center-based group and home-based individual exercise programs have similar impacts on gait and balance in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized trial.
Combined training improves the expression profile of inflammation-associated antimicrobial peptides, MicroRNAs, and TLR-4 in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Progressive resistance exercise training and changes in resting-state functional connectivity of the caudate in persons with multiple sclerosis and severe fatigue: a proof-of-concept study.
Combined exercise training reduces fatigue and modulates the cytokine profile of T-cells from multiple sclerosis patients in response to neuromediators.
The effects of aerobic training on the functional status, quality of life, the level of fatigue and disability in patients with multiple sclerosis-a preliminary report.
Do baseline cognitive status, participant specific characteristics and EDSS impact changes of cognitive performance following aerobic exercise intervention in multiple sclerosis?.
A comparative study of the effects of yoga and clinical Pilates training on walking, cognition, respiratory functions, and quality of life in persons with multiple sclerosis: a quasi-experimental study.
In patients with multiple sclerosis, both objective and subjective sleep, depression, fatigue, and paresthesia improved after 3 weeks of regular exercise.
A randomized trial to investigate the effects of functional electrical stimulation and therapeutic exercise on walking performance for people with multiple sclerosis.
The effects of supervised versus home Pilates-based core stability training on lower extremity muscle strength and postural sway in people with multiple sclerosis.
Exergaming with additional postural demands improves balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis as much as conventional balance training and leads to high adherence to home-based balance training.
Standardized, comprehensive, hospital-based circuit training in people with multiple sclerosis: results on feasibility, adherence and satisfaction of the training intervention.
The effect of cycling using active-passive trainers on spasticity, cardiovascular fitness, function and quality of life in people with moderate to severe Multiple Sclerosis (MS); a feasibility study.
CoDuSe group exercise programme improves balance and reduces falls in people with multiple sclerosis: a multi-centre, randomized, controlled pilot study.
Pilot randomized trial of progressive resistance exercise augmented by neuromuscular electrical stimulation for people with multiple sclerosis who use walking aids.
Yoga training has positive effects on postural balance and its influence on activities of daily living in people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study.
Effects of a training program involving body cooling on physical and cognitive capacities and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients: a pilot study.
Intensive multimodal training to improve gait resistance, mobility, balance and cognitive function in persons with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
The effect of balance training on postural control in people with multiple sclerosis using the CAREN virtual reality system: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
The effects of a 12-week leisure centre-based, group exercise intervention for people moderately affected with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled pilot study.
Effects of robot-assisted gait training combined with virtual reality on motor and cognitive functions in patients with multiple sclerosis: A pilot, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Randomized controlled trial of exercise interventions to improve sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study.
Comparing the effects of whole-body vibration to standard exercise in ambulatory people with Multiple Sclerosis: a randomised controlled feasibility study.
Data presented in Mean ± SD. RCT = Randomized controlled trail; IWC = Intervention without control; Int. Type = Intervention type, 1 = Resistance training; 2 = Endurance training; 3 = Balance training; 4 = Walking; 5 = Body and Mind exercise; 6 = Others; 7 = Combination of two or more modalities; 8 = Non-Exercise (a study that has tested the effects an exercise intervention but also of a non-training component e.g. temperature, smell, sound etc).; IG = Number of intervention groups; BMI = Body Mass Index; and EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale.
Data from all groups included in RCTs were extracted, including control groups. The categorization of RCT groups were performed the following way: All groups in RCTs with a superiority design, comparing two or more exercise interventions, were reported as exercise groups, despite one of these groups being the methodological comparator. Further, RCTs including, in addition to the exercise group, a group receiving a non-exercise intervention (e.g. massage or scent impression), were categorized as having a “non-exercise” group although this is beside the applied exercise definition. Hence the total number of intervention groups surpasses the total number of studies included.
2.6 Statistics
All statistical analysis was undertaken using STATA software version 17 (STATA, IC 17, Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA), and graphs were made using GraphPad Prism version 9.3.1 (GraphPad Software Inc., California, USA). Means and standard deviations (SD) were calculated.
3. Results
3.1 Study inclusion
The systematic search yielded a total of 4576 records, which after the removal of duplicates, resulted in 3714 records. Screening identified 556 records deemed relevant for full-text inspection. Of the 556 records, 5 records could not be retrieved, hence 551 records were assessed for eligibility at a full-text level. While screening the 551 records, one additional report was found from searching the reference lists. Of the 552 records, a total of 202 records were deemed eligible and subsequently included in the review (for further review details see Fig. 1 and for all included studies see Table 1).
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the literature search according to items in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline.
Table 2 summarizes population demographics, clinical characteristics, and study designs of the included studies. The identified studies covered a total of 8037 pwMS, having a mean EDSS of 3.7 ± 1.4 and a mean disease duration of 11 ± 4.1 years. Of these, information on MS-subtypes was reported in 5149 (64.1%) pwMS. The mean age across all studies was 44.7 ± 7.2 years, with more females (73.6%) than males being enrolled. The mean intervention group size across all studies was 17 participants (range: 5-67). The duration of the exercise interventions ranged from 2 to 52 weeks with a mean of 10.7 ± 7.7 weeks. 70 studies had more than one intervention group, which explains why the total number of interventions (n = 285) exceeded the total number of studies included in this review (n = 202). Of the 202 included records, a total of 108 were RCTs (53.5%), 17 were controlled trials (8.4%), 40 were intervention studies without controls (19.8%), and 37 were pilot RCT studies (18.3%).
Table 2Summary of participant demographics, intervention type and study design reported by age group for the enrolled studies.
Age groups
≤ 29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
≥ 60
Total
Number of studies reporting (%)
Number of studies, N (%)
2 (1.0)
20 (9.9)
29 (14.4)
48 (23.8)
59 (29.2)
30 (14.9)
11 (5.9)
3 (1.5)
202 (100)
202 (100)
Participants sample, N (avg. participant number per study)
63 (32)
825 (41)
1135 (39)
1819 (38)
2217 (38)
1517 (51)
375 (32)
86 (29)
8037 (40)
202 (100)
Age [years]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
44.7 ± 7.2
202 (100)
Gender [% Females]
74.8 ± 9.6
81.1 ± 26.7
80.8 ± 15.5
72.8 ± 13.3
70.9 ± 13.8
68.7 ± 8.6
68.6 ± 6.4
75.7 ± 3.0
73.6 ± 15.8
196 (96.6)
BMI [kg⋅m−2]
23.4 ± 3.6
24.8 ± 1.2
24.7 ± 1.1
24.9 ± 1.8
25.6 ± 2.2
25.6 ± 2.0
23.8 ± 2.5
-
25.0 ± 1.8
100 (49.3)
EDSS [points]
1.98 ± 1.1
2.71 ± 1.0
2.73 ± 1.0
3.17 ± 0.9
3.95 ± 1.3
4.72 ± 1.3
6.04 ± 0.2
-
3.7 ± 1.4
118 (58.4)
Disease duration [years]
9.9 ± 3.0
6.8 ± 4.0
7.2 ± 1.7
9.7 ± 2.4
12.3 ± 3.3
13.2 ± 2.8
16.3 ± 4.2
18 .0 ± 2.7
11.0 ± 4.1
125 (61.9)
MS subtype [avg. %], RRMS/SPMS/PPMS/PRMS
48/12/28/0
55/1/6/24
91/20/5/0
86/14/11/0
77/26/16/4
56/40/19/0
51/35/28/0
75/16/13/0
3697/924/514/14*
125 (61.9)
Training Duration, [weeks]
10.0 ± 2.8
9.1 ± 2.1
12.4 ± 11.7
12.5 ± 6.8
11.4 ± 8.4
7.1 ± 4.2
8.3 ± 6.5
12.0 ± 0.0
10.7 ± 7.7
202 (100)
Intervention type
Endurance Training
1
4
11
22
16
10
5
0
68 (24.9)
-
Combined Training
1
3
11
16
15
15
3
3
67 (24.5)
-
Resistance Training
2
1
0
7
22
4
2
0
38 (13.9)
-
Other
0
2
7
4
7
10
1
0
31 (11.4)
-
Body and Mind Exercise
0
6
5
5
7
2
0
0
25 (9.2)
-
Walking
0
1
0
0
8
6
5
0
20 (7.3)
-
Balance Training
0
2
4
3
6
2
1
1
19 (7.0)
-
Non-Exercise
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
1
5 (1.8)
-
Total
4
19
39
57
84
49
16
5
273 (100)
-
Study design
RCT
1
18
16
23
35
11
3
1
108 (53.5)
-
Control trail
0
0
3
7
5
1
1
0
17 (8.4)
-
Intervention without control
0
2
4
13
9
10
2
0
40 (19.8)
-
RCT pilot
1
0
6
5
10
8
5
2
37 (18.3)
-
Total
2
20
29
48
59
30
11
3
202 (100)
-
Note: Data presented are Mean ± SD, percentages, or number of studies/participants. EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; BMI = Body Mass Index; RRMS = Relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS = Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; PPMS = Primary progressive multiple sclerosis; PRMS = Progressive-relapsing multiple sclerosis; RCT = Randomized controlled trail, Non-Exercise = An exercise intervention study that also tests a non-training component (e.g. temperature, smell, sound etc.). *MS subtype total is presented as the total number of participants in the 4 subtypes of MS.
Fig. 3 shows the distribution of the different exercise modalities. Endurance exercise (24.9%) and combined exercise (24.5%) constitutes 49.5% of the total number of interventions. The least prevalent modalities are balance exercise (7.0%), walking (7.3%), and body & mind exercise (9.2%).
3.4 Studies by age-groups
Table 2 and Fig. 2 summarize the distribution of studies by age. A total of 29.2% of the tested pwMS were in the age-group 45-49, and 82.2% of the studies were conducted in participants aged 35-54. Only 1.5% of all studies were conducted in pwMS ≥60 years. The proportion of studies applying a RCT design varies between age groups from 27.3% (age-group 55–59 years; 3 of 11 studies) to 90% (age-group 30-34 years; 18 of 20 studies). Controlled trials have not been applied in 3 out of 8 age groups.
Fig. 2Exercise modalities divided by study design.
When solely analysing the RCT studies, 78.7% of the studies were conducted in patients aged 35–54 (Table 5 and Fig. 2). Resistance and endurance exercise was evaluated in 38 (13.9%) and 68 (24.9%) studies, respectively. 76.3% of the resistance exercise studies were conducted in patients aged 40-49. A total of 125 (61.9%) studies reported MS subtype of the participants, which showed that 71.8% had RRMS, 17.9% had SPMS, 10.0% had PPMS, and 0.3% had PRMS (Table 2).
3.5 Studies by disability level and disease duration
Data presented in Tables 3 and 4 are based on the same studies as in Table 2, yet here stratified by EDSS-groups (Table 3) or disease duration (Table 4). In total, 88.1% of the studies were conducted in pwMS with EDSS-scores between 2.0 and 6.5 (Table 3). A total of 13 studies (11.0%) have been conducted in patients with an EDSS of ≤1.0, and one single study (0.8%) was found reporting data from patients with an EDSS of ≥7.0
Table 3Summary of participant demographics, intervention type and study design reported by EDSS group for the enrolled studies.
EDSS groups
≤1.5
2.0-2.5
3.0-3.5
4.0-4.5
5.0-5.5
6.0-6.5
≥7.0
Total
Number of studies reporting (%)
Number of studies, N (%)
13 (11.0)
28 (23.7)
35 (29.7)
21 (17.8)
9 (7.6)
11 (9.3)
1 (0.8)
118 (100)
118 (100)
Participants sample, N (avg. participant number per study)
570 (44)
1205 (43)
1286 (37)
788 (38)
327 (36)
440 (40)
24 (24)
4640 (39)
118 (100)
Age [years]
37.8 ± 5.5
40.9 ± 5.4
43.9 ± 5.5
46.7 ± 5.5
51.3 ± 6.0
57.3 ± 4.0
54.1 ± 2.6
44.4 ± 6.8
118 (100)
Gender [% Females]
78.5 ± 14.8
78.4 ± 16.2
73.8 ± 14.7
63.6 ± 24.4
72.3 ± 12.7
63.1 ± 6.4
62.5
72.4 ± 17.3
116 (98.3)
BMI [kg⋅m−2]
24.5 ± 1.0
25.5 ± 1.6
25.6 ± 1.8
24.4 ± 1.2
23.6 ± 1.3
22.5 ± 1.4
-
25.1 ± 1.7
66 (55.9)
Disease duration [years]
7.0 ± 2.7
8.3 ± 2.8
10.1 ± 2.3
11.3 ± 2.9
14.2 ± 4.3
15.4 ± 3.6
15.5 ± 3.3
10.6 ± 4.0
77 (65.6)
MS subtype [avg. %], RR/SP/PP/PR
92/5/2/0
83/6/10/0
80/9/19/14
58/25/32/0
55/27/51/0
38/24/58/0
13/21/67/0
2297/240/637/14*
118 (100)
Training Duration, [weeks]
15.9 ± 16.2
9.0 ± 4.8
12.6 ± 6.7
8.3 ± 5.1
4.4 ± 4.9
7.3 ± 4.9
4.0
10.4 ± 7.8
118 (100)
Note: Data presented are Mean ± SD, percentages, or number of studies/participants. EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; BMI = Body Mass Index; RRMS = Relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS = Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; PPMS = Primary progressive multiple sclerosis; PRMS = Progressive-relapsing multiple sclerosis; RCT: Randomized controlled trail. *MS subtype total is presented as the total number of participants in the 4 subtypes of MS.
Table 4Summary of participant demographics, intervention type and study design reported by Disease Duration groups for the enrolled studies.
Disease Duration groups [years]
≤4.9
5.0 - 9.9
10.0 - 14.9
15.0 - 19.9
≥20.0
Total
Number of studies reporting (%)
Number of studies, N (%)
5 (4)
51 (40.8)
49 (39.2)
15 (12)
5 (4)
125 (100)
125 (100)
Participants sample, N (avg. participant number per study)
153 (31)
2427 (48)
2207 (45)
497 (33)
134 (27)
5418 (43)
125 (100)
Age [years]
34.2 ± 3.4
40.6 ± 5.4
47.4 ± 5.6
52.2 ± 6.9
55.2 ± 6.3
45.0 ± 7.5
125 (100)
Gender [% Females]
74.8 ± 43.3
74.6 ± 13.0
71.3 ± 11.1
69.1 ± 8.4
60.6 ± 7.9
72.2 ± 14.0
124 (99.2)
BMI [kg⋅m−2]
24.3 ± 1.7
25.0 ± 1.3
24.8 ± 2.5
24.8 ± 0.1
-
24.9 ± 1.8
59 (47.2)
EDSS [points]
2.6 ± 1.5
2.9 ± 1.0
4.2 ± 1.4
5.5 ± 1.3
6.4 ± 0.4
3.8 ± 1.5
77 (61.6)
MS subtype [avg. %], RRMS/SPMS/PPMS/PRMS
76/0/0/0
88/11/8/4
69/28/20/0
45/43/26/0
56/43/19/0
2710/711/404/4*
90 (72)
Training Duration, [weeks]
12.6 ± 7.7
11.8 ± 9.7
9.2 ± 4.7
8.9 ± 6.6
8.6 ± 3.4
10.4 ± 7.5
125 (100)
Note: Data presented are Mean ± SD, percentages, or number of studies/participants. EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; BMI = Body Mass Index; RRMS = Relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS = Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; PPMS = Primary progressive multiple sclerosis; PRMS = Progressive-relapsing multiple sclerosis; RCT: Randomized controlled trail. *MS subtype total is presented as the total number of participants in the 4 subtypes of MS.
Table 5Summary of participant demographics, intervention type and study design reported by age group for the enrolled RCT studies.
Age groups
≤ 29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
≥ 60
Total
Number of studies reporting (%)
Number of studies, N (%)
1 (0.9)
18 (16.7)
15 (13.9)
24 (22.2)
35 (32.4)
11 (14.2)
3 (2.8)
1 (0.9)
108 (100)
108 (100)
Participants sample, N (avg. participant pr. study)
38 (38)
781 (43)
639 (43)
1140 (48)
1613 (46)
839 (76)
142 (47)
34 (34)
5226 (48)
108 (100)
Age [yrs]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
44.7 ± 7.2
202 (100)
Gender [% Females]
81.6
82.6 ± 26.8
81.4 ± 17.6
73.0 ± 12.7
71.0 ± 13.1
70.0 ± 10.6
62.6 ± 7.7
73.5
74.7 ± 16.8
105 (96.6)
BMI [kg⋅m−2]
23.4 ± 3.5
24.8 ± 1.3
24.6 ± 0.9
25.3 ± 1.4
25.4 ± 2.6
26.1 ± 2.7
-
-
25.1 ± 1.9
55 (49.3)
EDSS [points]
2.0 ± 1.1
2.6 ± 1.0
2.7 ± 1.2
3.1 ± 0.7
4.0 ± 1.3
4.4 ± 1.4
5.8 ± 1.0
-
3.4 ± 1.3
64 (58.4)
Disease duration [yrs]
7.7 ± 3.3
6.8 ± 4.3
6.7 ± 1.7
8.7 ± 2.1
12.3 ± 2.8
11.3 ± 2.0
10.0 ± 10.0
17.0 ± 8.6
9.7 ± 3.1
69 (61.9)
MS subtype [avg. %], RR/SP/PP/PR
-
94/9/55/24
90/18/5/0
85/13/13/0
77/23/16/4
56/33/19/0
48/34/31/0
59/27/15/0
2557/512/373/14*
? (61.9)
Training Duration, [weeks]
8.0
8.7 ± 1.9
10.1 ± 4.9
14.0 ± 7.2
12.0 ± 7.2
8.3 ± 3.2
5.0 ± 2.7
12.0
10.9 ± 6.1
108 (100)
Intervention type
Combined Training
1
1
4
11
14
5
1
1
38 (26.8)
-
Endurance Training
1
4
8
9
5
1
1
0
29 (20.4)
-
Body and Mind Exercise
0
6
2
1
6
2
0
0
17 (11.9)
-
Resistance Training
0
0
0
4
9
3
1
0
17 (11.9)
-
Balance Training
0
2
4
2
5
2
0
0
15 (10.6)
-
Other
0
2
3
1
5
4
0
0
15 (10.6)
-
Walking
0
1
0
0
1
2
3
0
7 (4.9)
-
Non-Exercise
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
4 (4.9)
-
Total
2
16
22
28
47
19
6
2
142 (100)
-
Note: Data presented are Mean ± SD, percentages, or number of studies/participants. EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; BMI = Body Mass Index; RR = Relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis; SP = Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; PP = Primary progressive multiple sclerosis; PR = Progressive-relapsing multiple sclerosis; Non-Exercise is when a study has tested the effects of a non-training component (e.g., temperature, smell, sound etc.) *MS subtype Total are presented as the total number of participants in the 4 subtypes of MS.
Note: Data presented are Mean ± SD, percentages, or number of studies/participants. EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; BMI = Body Mass Index; RRMS = Relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS = Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; PPMS = Primary progressive multiple sclerosis; PRMS = Progressive-relapsing multiple sclerosis; Non-Exercise = A exercise intervention study but also testing a non-training component (e.g. temperature, smell, sound etc.).
*MS subtype total is presented as the total number of participants in the 4 subtypes of MS.
The present review aimed to map patient characteristics, exercise modality, and study design of the existing MS exercise literature to identify potential knowledge gaps for certain subgroups of pwMS. The main finding of the present review was that the majority of the existing studies (82.2%; n = 166) have enrolled pwMS aged 35-54 years. It was further observed that pwMS with mild (<2.0) or severe (>6.5) disability scores (EDSS) only constitute 11.9% (n = 14) of participants across all MS exercise studies reporting EDSS-data. Finally, pwMS with a short (<5yr) or long (>15yr) disease duration are rarely enrolled in MS exercise studies as those with a disease duration of 5-15-years account for 80% (n = 100) of all studies. Altogether, these findings emphasize limitations when generalizing evidence of exercise effects in pwMS. It further highlights the need to expand exercise research to certain subgroups of pwMS, including both young and older, mildly and severely disabled, and those with short and long disease duration.
According to a newly published report from the Danish MS registry (
), only ∼1.5% of pwMS are below 25 years of age, whereas ∼49% are ≥55 years. Nonetheless, the present review observed that only 7% of the exercise studies enrolled pwMS ≥55 years and 1.5% ≥60 years. This leaves a marked discrepancy between the study population and the general population across the existing MS exercise studies. In addition, more than 80% of the existing studies have been conducted in an age span (35-54 years) covering approximately 40% of the general MS population age span, further underlining the need to focus on specific subgroups in the years to come. For instance, merely no exercise studies exist in older pwMS. This is somewhat surprising given the widely recognized positive effects of exercise among otherwise healthy older adults (
). The missing studies of exercise effect in older pwMS could be due to older pwMS being more likely to have substantial disability (see the following section for further discussion of the impact of disability), however this indicate that they would thus benefit more from exercise. Interestingly, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis by
found that the positive effects of exercise across modalities on participation (a complex component of quality of life) in pwMS were not affected by clinical variables. This suggests that exercise can potentially also improve quality of life even late in life, however, this warrants further investigations as no exercise studies have been performed in such populations. In addition, the systematic search revealed no exercise studies performed in the early stages of the disease course (<3 years after diagnosis). This is in line with recent reviews from our group highlighting the limited evidence on early exercise interventions, hence suggesting there could be a “window of opportunity” by introducing exercise at an early stage of the disease (
). However, shortly after the review process of the present systematic review, an RCT investigating 48 weeks of aerobic exercise in pwMS with a disease duration ≤2 years was published. Showing positive effects on physical function and brain microstructure in these newly diagnosed pwMS (
Investigating the potential disease-modifying and neuroprotective efficacy of exercise therapy early in the disease course of multiple sclerosis: The Early Multiple Sclerosis Exercise Study (EMSES).
). Supporting the notion that if exercise is initiated before the disease causes irreversible neurological damage, this will offer a superior preventive approach as opposed to the more symptomatic treatment approach currently applied (
). Such an early phase approach is inspired by the medical field, where disease-modifying therapy is recommended to be initiated as early as possible in order to maximize neurological reserve as well as cognitive- and physical function (
Severe disabilities are infrequently included in MS exercise studies, highlighted by the finding of this present review. This could be due to the increasing difficulty carrying out exercise interventions in pwMS with higher EDSS (
). However, two studies have evaluated exercise in pwMS with higher disability levels (EDSS ranging from 5.0 to 8.0), showing that both endurance exercise and resistance exercise are feasible and able to induce physiological adaptations (
) by including studies where some participants had an EDSS>6.0. Their findings showed promising evidence for the benefits of exercise, but some of the included pwMS had EDSS as low as 3.0, and very few of the included studies had solely enrolled participants with an EDSS >6.0 (
), emphasizing the need for further studies. This is important as a disability score ≥7.5 is a major risk factor for death, being almost 4 times the rate of healthy controls (
), suggesting that structured physical activity (i.e., exercise) could be beneficial and perhaps even reduce the increased mortality rate of the severely disabled pwMS.
Related to the finding that the majority of pwMS included in exercise studies have mild disability, the majority of included pwMS have RRMS (71.8%), while only smaller samples of the patients have either SPMS (17.9%), PPMS (10.0%) or PRMS (0.3%). Although the observed distribution of MS phenotypes across exercise studies does resemble the generally young and middle-aged MS population quite well (
), it can still be questioned whether the existing results from exercise studies can be generalized across all MS phenotypes. At least, it must be considered that the existing evidence is mainly based on data from RRMS patients. Of notice, an increasing focus has been put on exercise and progressive MS in recent years (
on behalf of the COGEx Reseach Team Study protocol: improving cognition in people with progressive multiple sclerosis: a multi-arm, randomized, blinded, sham-controlled trial of cognitive rehabilitation and aerobic exercise (COGEx).
). These recommendations were published by some of the leading researchers and experts in the field and aimed to provide recommendations for clinicians treating pwMS (
). The recommendations are categorized according to EDSS subgroups (0-4.5, 5.0-6.5, 7.0-7.5, 8.0-8.5, and 9.0) and were based on both evidence and expert consensus when necessary (
). However, the present review finds only one exercise study investigating exercise in pwMS with EDSS ≥7.0. This entail that future exercise recommendation would benefit from more exercise studies in severely disabled pwMS, as for now expert opinion is the best resource in the development of recommendations for pwMS with EDSS ≥7.0. The same applies to old pwMS and pwMS with short (<4.5y) or long (>20y) disease duration. Together this underlines the need for further exercise studies in select MS subgroups, even though this introduces several challenges, in particular related to the most severely disabled pwMS.
6. Limitations
When interpreting the results from the present review, various limitations must be kept in mind. First, this review follows the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, except that no quality assessment of the included studies was performed. This was omitted as several different study designs were included, which makes it complex to facilitate via one single quality assessment tool. Furthermore, the review does not evaluate the outcomes/effects of the included studies, however, it exclusively maps the demographic and clinical data of the pwMS included in the existing exercise studies. Second, since exercise can be somewhat difficult to define, the applied definition could potentially exclude studies that would be considered exercise studies by some. Third, it is acknowledged that the categorization of age groups, EDSS groups, and disease duration groups is based on average values reported by the identified studies. Consequently, some studies may have enrolled participants that are within the range of some of the sparsely investigated MS subgroups. Fourth, the distinction between RCT and pilot RCT was based solely on the author's own description of the study design in the papers. Hence, an objective distinction between RCT and pilot RCT was not made, potentially leading to some RCT and pilot RCT being very similar, e.g. in relation to sample size.
7. Conclusion
The present review identified a large body of exercise studies (n = 202) evaluating exercise in pwMS. These studies primarily included middle-aged (35-54 years) pwMS having disability scores of 2.0-6.5 and a disease duration of 5-14.5 years. Exercise studies have mainly evaluated short-lasting (≤ 12 weeks) endurance exercise and combined exercise interventions. Very few studies evaluating exercise interventions were identified in young (<35 years) or older (>54 years) MS populations, as well as in pwMS with mild (<2.0) or severe (>6.5) disability scores (EDSS) and short (<5 years) or long (>15 years) disease durations. Our findings suggest that no well-founded evidence-based guidelines for exercise can be given to these specific groups of pwMS, encouraging future exercise studies and research in these under-investigated MS subpopulations.
Funding
The study received no funding.
Availability of data and material
Data will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Tobias Gaemelke: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Jens Jakob Frandsen: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Lars G. Hvid: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Ulrik Dalgas: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
No competing interest to declare.
References
Abasiyanik Z.
Ertekin O.
Kahraman T.
Yigit P.
Ozakbas S.
The effects of clinical Pilates training on walking, balance, fall risk, respiratory and cognitive functions in persons with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
A comparative study of the effects of yoga and clinical Pilates training on walking, cognition, respiratory functions, and quality of life in persons with multiple sclerosis: a quasi-experimental study.
Progressive resistance exercise training and changes in resting-state functional connectivity of the caudate in persons with multiple sclerosis and severe fatigue: a proof-of-concept study.
Combined exercise training reduces fatigue and modulates the cytokine profile of T-cells from multiple sclerosis patients in response to neuromediators.
The effects of 10-week core stability training on balance in women with multiple sclerosis according to expanded disability status scale: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Group-based, individualized, comprehensive core stability and balance intervention provides immediate and long-term improvements in walking in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
In patients with multiple sclerosis, both objective and subjective sleep, depression, fatigue, and paresthesia improved after 3 weeks of regular exercise.
Short-term interval aerobic exercise training does not improve memory functioning in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis – a randomized controlled trial.
The effect of cycling using active-passive trainers on spasticity, cardiovascular fitness, function and quality of life in people with moderate to severe Multiple Sclerosis (MS); a feasibility study.
A randomized trial to investigate the effects of functional electrical stimulation and therapeutic exercise on walking performance for people with multiple sclerosis.
How do resistance training and balance and motor control training affect gait performance and fatigue impact in people with multiple sclerosis? A randomized controlled multi-center study.
CoDuSe group exercise programme improves balance and reduces falls in people with multiple sclerosis: a multi-centre, randomized, controlled pilot study.
Pragmatic intervention for increasing self-directed exercise behaviour and improving important health outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial.
Fatigue, as measured using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, is a predictor of processing speed improvement induced by exercise in patients with multiple sclerosis: data from a randomized controlled trial.
Pilot randomized trial of progressive resistance exercise augmented by neuromuscular electrical stimulation for people with multiple sclerosis who use walking aids.
Yoga training has positive effects on postural balance and its influence on activities of daily living in people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study.
12 weeks of combined endurance and resistance training reduces innate markers of inflammation in a randomized controlled clinical trial in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Progressive resistance training did not improve walking but can improve muscle performance, quality of life and fatigue in adults with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
The effect of aerobic exercise on Neurofilament light chain and glial Fibrillary acidic protein level in patients with relapsing remitting type multiple sclerosis.
Study protocol: improving cognition in people with progressive multiple sclerosis: a multi-arm, randomized, blinded, sham-controlled trial of cognitive rehabilitation and aerobic exercise (COGEx).
Effects of an individual 12-week community-located “start-to-run” program on physical capacity, walking, fatigue, cognitive function, brain volumes, and structures in persons with multiple sclerosis.
Effects of pilates-based core stability training in ambulant people with multiple sclerosis: multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
Combined exercise training reduces IFN-γ and IL-17 levels in the plasma and the supernatant of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in women with multiple sclerosis.
Effects of a training program involving body cooling on physical and cognitive capacities and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients: a pilot study.
The effects of supervised versus home Pilates-based core stability training on lower extremity muscle strength and postural sway in people with multiple sclerosis.
Effects of high-intensity resistance training on strength, mobility, balance, and fatigue in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Effects of a home-based step training programme on balance, stepping, cognition and functional performance in people with multiple sclerosis – a randomized controlled trial.
Intensive multimodal training to improve gait resistance, mobility, balance and cognitive function in persons with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
The effect of balance training on postural control in people with multiple sclerosis using the CAREN virtual reality system: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Randomized controlled trial to examine the impact of aquatic exercise training on functional capacity, balance, and perceptions of fatigue in female patients with multiple sclerosis.
Neuromuscular adaptations to long-term progressive resistance training translates to improved functional capacity for people with multiple sclerosis and is maintained at follow-up.
Exergaming with additional postural demands improves balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis as much as conventional balance training and leads to high adherence to home-based balance training.
Calling out MS fatigue: feasibility and preliminary effects of a pilot randomized telephone-delivered exercise intervention for multiple sclerosis fatigue.