Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 65, 104087, September 2022

Download started.

Ok

Fetal and post-natal growth in infants of mothers with multiple sclerosis: A case-control stud

      Highlights

      • Multiple sclerosis does not seem to adversely affect fetal and neonatal outcomes.
      • We studied fetoneonatal growth in offsprings of mothers with multiple sclerosis.
      • Multiple sclerosis in pregnancy does not seem to affect fetal and neonatal growth.
      • We think that these results represent a very important and reassuring information.

      Abstract

      Background

      Multiple sclerosis does not seem to adversely affect fetal and neonatal outcomes, although some studies reported a possible reduction in mean birth weight and length, and a higher incidence of preterm delivery, mainly in relation to the exposure to disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) during pregnancy. Few data are available on intrauterine fetal growth and postnatal somatic development of newborns from mothers with multiple sclerosis compared to those from healthy women. For these reasons, we decided to investigate fetal growth, neonatal anthropometric parameters, and postnatal somatic development up to 12 months of life in offsprings from MS mothers.

      Methods

      This retrospective cohort study included 211 women with multiple sclerosis, and 384 healthy women paired for maternal age and parity as controls. Fetal biometric parameters (biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length) measured during the third trimester of pregnancy (30–34 weeks’ gestation) were retrieved from the computerized database of the Department (EcoPlus*) where the results of ultrasound exams performed in the hospital are stored. Newborn measurements (weight, length and head circumference) at birth were obtained from the hospital's computerized obstetric and neonatal database (Trackare* and Remote* data base); measurements at 6 and 12 months of life were obtained from the regional database (ECWMED*) of family pediatricians of our region.

      Results

      No differences between the two groups were observed for all the fetal parameters considered, expressed as centiles of growth according to gestational age (biparietal diameter: p = 0.40; head circumference: p = 0.40; abdominal circumference: p = 0.32; femur length: p = 0.32). No differences in gestational age at delivery, birthweight, and in the incidence of low birthweight and small for gestational age newborns were observed between the two groups. In the multiple sclerosis group a significantly higher incidence of caesarean section (p = 0.01) and late preterm delivery (at less than 37 weeks'gestation, p = 0.001) were registered. The trends of postnatal growth in weight (F = 0.53; p-value = 0.590) and length (F = 0.44; p-value = 0.645) were superimposable between the two groups. The trends of growth for head circumference showed a slightly, not significantly greater head circumference of infants from mothers with multiple sclerosis at 6 months of life, but the values at twelve months of life in the two groups were similar (F = 0.85; p-value = 0.427) . Moreover, the trends of postnatal increase of weight (F = 1.016; p-value = 0.331), length (F = 2.001; p-value = 0.146) and head circumference (F = 1.591; p-value = 0.212) of newborns/infants (from birth to twelve months of life) born to mothers with multiple sclerosis who breastfed, mothers who did not, and in the control group were similar.

      Conclusion

      Multiple sclerosis in pregnancy does not seem to affect fetal growth and postnatal development during the first year of the offspring life. We think that these results represent an important and reassuring information to provide the patients with during preconception counseling.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      MS (multiple sclerosis), EDSS (expanded disability status scale), BMI (body-mass index), DMT (disease-modifying therapy), ART (assisted reproductive technology), SGA (small for gestational age), BPD (biparietal diameter), HC (head circumference), AC (abdominal circumference), FL (femur length)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Amato M.P.
        • Portaccio E.
        • Ghezzi A.
        • et al.
        Pregnancy and fetal outcomes after interferon-beta exposure in multiple sclerosis.
        Neurology. 2010; 75: 1794-1802https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fd62bb
        • Amato M.P.
        • Bertolotto A.
        • Brunelli R.
        • et al.
        Management of pregnancy-related issues in multiple sclerosis patients: the need for an interdisciplinary approach.
        Neurol. Sci. 2017; 38: 1849-1858https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3081-8
        • Barker D.J.
        • Thornburg KL.
        The obstetric origins of health for a lifetime.
        Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 56: 511-519https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e31829cb9ca
        • Burkill S.
        • Vattulainen P.
        • Geissbuelher Y.
        • et al.
        The association between exposure to interferon-beta during pregnancy and birth measurements in offspring of women with multiple sclerosis.
        PLOS One. 2019; 14e0227120https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227120
        • Canibano B.
        • Deleu D.
        • Mesraoua B.
        • Melikyan G.
        • Ibrahim F.
        • Hanssens Y.
        Pregnancy-related issues in women with multiple sclerosis: an evidence-based review with practical recommendations.
        J. Drug Assess. 2020; 9: 20-36https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2020.1721507
        • Chen Y.H.
        • Lin H.L.
        • Lin HC.
        Does multiple sclerosis increase risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes? A population-based study.
        Mult. Scler. 2009; 15: 606-612https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458508101937
        • Ciplea A.I.
        • Hellwig K.
        Exposure to natalizumab during pregnancy is safe-commentary.
        Mult. Scler. J. 2020; 26: 892-893https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458520928795
        • Confavreux C.
        • Hutchinson M.
        • Hours M.M.
        • Pregnancy in Multiple Sclerosis Group
        Rate of pregnancy-related relapse in multiple sclerosis.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1998; 339: 285-291https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199807303390501
        • Dahl J.
        • Myhr K.M.
        • Daltveit A.K.
        • Hoff J.M.
        • Gilhus N.E.
        Pregnancy, delivery, and birth outcome in women with multiple sclerosis.
        Neurology. 2005; 65: 1961-1963https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000188898.02018.95
        • Dahl J.
        • Myhr K.M.
        • Daltveit A.K.
        • Gilhus N.E.
        Pregnancy, delivery and birth outcome in different stages of maternal multiple sclerosis.
        J. Neurol. 2008; 255: 623-627https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-0757-2
        • Dobson R.
        • Dassan P.
        • Roberts M.
        • Giovannoni G.
        • Nelson-Piercy C.
        • Brex PA.
        UK consensus on pregnancy in multiple sclerosis: ‘Association of British Neurologists’ guidelines.
        Pract. Neurol. 2019; 19: 106-114https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2018-002060
        • Fragoso Y.D.
        • Boggild M.
        • Macias-Islas M.A.
        • et al.
        The effects of long-term exposure to disease-modifying drugs during pregnancy in multiple sclerosis.
        Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2013; 115: 154-159https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.04.024
        • Fragoso Y.D.
        • Adoni T.
        • Bidin Brooks J.B.
        • et al.
        Practical evidence-based recommendations for patients with multiple sclerosis who want to have children.
        Neurol. Ther. 2018; 7: 207-232https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-018-0110-3
        • Hellwig K.
        Pregnancy in multiple sclerosis.
        Eur. Neurol. 2014; 72: 39-42https://doi.org/10.1159/000367640
        • Kelly V.M.
        • Nelson L.M.
        • Chakravarty E.F.
        Obstetric outcomes in women with multiple sclerosis and epilepsy.
        Neurology. 2009; 73: 1831-1836https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c3f27d
        • Levy Y.
        Developmental delay” reconsidered: the critical role of age-dependent, co-variant development.
        Front Psychol. 2018; 9: 503https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00503
        • Linsell L.
        • Malouf R.
        • Morris J.
        • Kurinczuk J.J.
        • Marlow N.
        Prognostic factors for poor cognitive development in children born very preterm or with very low birth weight. A systematic review.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169: 1162-1172https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2175
        • Liu B.
        • Xu G.
        • Sun Y.
        • et al.
        Maternal cigarette smoking before and during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth: a dose-response analysis of 25 million mother-infant pairs.
        PLOS Med. 2020; 17e1003158https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003158
        • Mahlanza T.D.
        • Manieri M.C.
        • Klawiter E.C.
        • et al.
        Prospective growth and developmental outcomes in infants born to mothers with multiple sclerosis.
        Mult. Scler. 2021; 27: 79-89https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458520904545
        • Miller D.H.
        • Fazekas F.
        • Montalban X.
        • Reingold S.C.
        • Trojano M.
        Pregnancy, sex and hormonal factors in multiple sclerosis.
        Mult. Scler. 2014; 20: 527-536https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458513519840
        • Mueller B.A.
        • Zhang J.
        • Critchlow C.W.
        Birth outcomes and need for hospitalization after delivery among women with multiple sclerosis.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002; 186: 446-452https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.120502
        • Papageorghiou A.T.
        • Ohuma E.O.
        • Altman D.G.
        • et al.
        International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements. The Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
        Lancet. 2014; 384: 869-879https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490-2
        • Portaccio E.
        • Annovazzi P.
        • Ghezzi A.
        • MS Study Group of the Italian Neurological Society
        Pregnancy decision-making in women with multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab: I: Fetal risks.
        Neurology. 2018; 90 (Epub 2018 Feb 7. Erratum in: Neurology. 2020 94(11):504. PMID: 29438046): e823-e831https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL0000000000005067
        • Villar J.
        • Cheikh Ismail L.
        • Victora C.G.
        • International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st)
        International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
        Lancet. 2014; 384: 857-868https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60932-6
        • Weber-Schoendorfer C.
        • Schaefer C.
        Multiple sclerosis, immunomodulators, and pregnancy outcome: a prospective observational study.
        Mult. Scler. 2009; 15: 1037-1042https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458509106543
        • Yeh W.Z.
        • Widyastuti P.A.
        • Van der Walt A.
        • MSBase Study Group
        Natalizumab, fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate use and pregnancy-related relapse and disability in women with multiple sclerosis.
        Neurology. 2021; 96: e2989-e3002https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012084