Advertisement
Original article| Volume 65, 103971, September 2022

Download started.

Ok

Assessment of economic burden of fatigue in adults with multiple sclerosis: An analysis of US National Health and Wellness Survey data

      Highlights

      • Fatigue is a disabling symptom commonly reported in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
      • Previous evidence on the economic burden of fatigue in MS by fatigue status (low vs high) is limited.
      • This cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study of pooled data from the 2017 and 2019 US National Health and Wellness Survey evaluated the economic burden of fatigue.
      • Fatigue was positively and significantly associated with measures of economic burden.
      • RRMS poses a substantial economic burden on patients and society, particularly among those with high fatigue.

      Abstract

      Background

      Fatigue, a common disabling symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS), is reported by the majority of patients. However, evidence on the economic burden of fatigue in MS by fatigue status is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the economic burden of fatigue, including healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), labor force participation, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), among adults with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) by low fatigue (LF) vs high fatigue (HF) and compared with adults without MS.

      Methods

      This cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study included pooled data from the 2017 and 2019 US National Health and Wellness Survey. The RRMS sample included respondents aged ≥18 years who reported being diagnosed with MS by a healthcare provider (HCP) and reported having RRMS. Non-MS controls included respondents aged ≥18 years who did not report being diagnosed with MS by an HCP. Fatigue was measured using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale-5 (MFIS-5). Outcomes included HCRU (HCP visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations in the past 12 months), labor force participation (yes vs no), WPAI (absenteeism, presenteeism, total work productivity impairment, and activity impairment), and annualized costs (direct medical, indirect, and total). Respondents with RRMS were propensity-score matched to non-MS controls (ratio 1:3). RRMS respondents were categorized as having LF (MFIS-5<15; RRMS+LF) and HF (MFIS-5≥15; RRMS+HF). Bivariate analysis compared matched non-MS controls, RRMS+LF, and RRMS+HF. Multivariable analyses were conducted among RRMS to evaluate associations between fatigue (continuous variable) and outcomes.

      Results

      Overall, 498 respondents with RRMS (RRMS+LF, n=375; RRMS+HF, n=123) and 1494 matched non-MS controls were included. RRMS+HF and RRMS+LF had more HCRU in the past 12 months than non-MS controls, whereas RRMS+HF had greater HCRU than RRMS+LF (all p<0.05). WPAI was also higher among RRMS+HF and RRMS+LF, compared with non-MS controls, as well as higher in RRMS+HF vs RRMS+LF (all p<0.001). RRMS+HF had significantly higher annualized direct medical costs than RRMS+LF and matched non-MS controls ($19,978 vs $10,656, p=0.007; vs $8,048, p<0.001). Among employed respondents, RRMS+HF and RRMS+LF had higher annualized indirect costs than non-MS controls, with RRMS+HF also having higher annualized indirect costs than RRMS+LF ($23,647 vs $13,738 vs $8,001; all p<0.01); total annualized costs were higher in RRMS+HF and RRMS+LF, compared with non-MS controls, as well as RRMS+HF vs RRMS+LF (all p<0.01). In multivariable models, fatigue was significantly and positively associated with the number of HCP visits in the past 12 months (p=0.002); not participating in the labor force (p<0.001); and absenteeism, presenteeism, total work productivity impairment, and activity impairment (all p<0.001).

      Conclusion

      RRMS poses a substantial economic burden on patients and society, and this burden is disproportionately associated with HF.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      CCI (Charlson Comorbidity Index), CHAMPUS (Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services), CI (confidence interval), ED (emergency department), GLM (generalized linear model), HCP (healthcare provider), HCRU (healthcare resource utilization), HF (high fatigue), LCL (lower confidence limit), LF (low fatigue), MFIS-5 (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale-5), MS (multiple sclerosis), NA (not applicable), NHWS (National Health and Wellness Survey), RRMS (relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis), SD (standard deviation), SE (standard error), UCL (upper confidence limit), US (United States), VA (Veterans Affairs), WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Adelman G.
        • Rane S.G.
        • Villa K.F.
        The cost burden of multiple sclerosis in the United States: a systematic review of the literature.
        J. Med. Econ. 2013; 16: 639-647https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2013.778268
      1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2021. Medical expenditure panel survey home. https://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/. (Accessed 10/15/21).

        • Allataifeh E.
        • Khalil H.
        • Almhdawi K.
        • Al-Shorman A.
        • Hawamdeh Z.
        • El-Salem K.
        • Bumin G.
        The clinical correlates of participation levels in people with multiple sclerosis.
        NeuroRehabilitation. 2020; 47: 153-160https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-203131
        • Bonafede M.
        • Mehta R.
        • Kim G.
        • Sruti I.
        • Tian M.
        • Pelletier C.
        • Goldfarb N.
        Productivity loss and associated costs among employed patients receiving disease-modifying treatment for multiple sclerosis.
        PharmacoEconomics Open. 2021; 5: 23-34https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00233-8
        • Brandes D.W.
        • Rieckmann P.
        The manifold economic impact of multiple sclerosis – indirect and direct costs of managing patients.
        Eur. Neurol. Rev. 2013; 8: 17-23
        • Cavallari M.
        • Palotai M.
        • Glanz B.I.
        • Egorova S.
        • Prieto J.C.
        • Healy B.C.
        • Chitnis T.
        • Guttmann C.R.
        Fatigue predicts disease worsening in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.
        Mult. Scler. 2016; 22: 1841-1849https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458516635874
        • Chen J.
        • Taylor B.
        • Palmer A.J.
        • Kirk-Brown A.
        • van Dijk P.
        • Simpson S.
        • Blizzard L.
        • van der Mei I.
        Estimating MS-related work productivity loss and factors associated with work productivity loss in a representative Australian sample of people with multiple sclerosis.
        Mult. Scler. 2019; 25: 994-1004https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518781971
        • Chwastiak L.A.
        • Gibbons L.E.
        • Ehde D.M.
        • Sullivan M.
        • Bowen J.D.
        • Bombardier C.H.
        • Kraft G.H.
        Fatigue and psychiatric illness in a large community sample of persons with multiple sclerosis.
        J. Psychosom. Res. 2005; 59: 291-298https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.001
        • Coyne K.S.
        • Boscoe A.N.
        • Currie B.M.
        • Landrian A.S.
        • Wandstrat T.L.
        Understanding drivers of employment changes in a multiple sclerosis population.
        Int. J. MS Care. 2015; 17: 245-252https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2014-051
        • D'Souza E.
        Modified fatigue impact scale - 5-item version (MFIS-5).
        Occup. Med. 2016; 66 (Lond): 256-257https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqv106
        • Desborough J.
        • Brunoro C.
        • Parkinson A.
        • Chisholm K.
        • Elisha M.
        • Drew J.
        • Fanning V.
        • Lueck C.
        • Bruestle A.
        • Cook M.
        • Suominen H.
        • Tricoli A.
        • Henschke A.
        • Phillips C.
        It struck at the heart of who I thought I was: a meta-synthesis of the qualitative literature examining the experiences of people with multiple sclerosis.
        Health Expect. 2020; 23: 1007-1027https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13093
        • Doesburg D.
        • Vennegoor A.
        • Uitdehaag B.M.J.
        • van Oosten B.W.
        High work absence around time of diagnosis of multiple sclerosis is associated with fatigue and relapse rate.
        Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2019; 31: 32-37https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.03.011
        • Dunn J.
        Impact of mobility impairment on the burden of caregiving in individuals with multiple sclerosis.
        Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 2010; 10: 433-440https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.10.34
        • Faissner S.
        • Plemel J.R.
        • Gold R.
        • Yong V.W.
        Progressive multiple sclerosis: from pathophysiology to therapeutic strategies.
        Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019; 18: 905-922https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-019-0035-2
        • Fisk J.D.
        • Ritvo P.G.
        • Ross L.
        • Haase D.A.
        • Marrie T.J.
        • Schlech W.F.
        Measuring the functional impact of fatigue: initial validation of the fatigue impact scale.
        Clin. Infect. Dis. 1994; 18: S79-S83https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/18.supplement_1.s79
        • Glanz B.I.
        • Degano I.R.
        • Rintell D.J.
        • Chitnis T.
        • Weiner H.L.
        • Healy B.C.
        Work productivity in relapsing multiple sclerosis: associations with disability, depression, fatigue, anxiety, cognition, and health-related quality of life.
        Value Health. 2012; 15: 1029-1035https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.07.010
        • Global Burden of Disease Neurological Disorders Collaborator Group
        Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015.
        Lancet Neurol. 2017; 16: 877-897https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30299-5
        • Gupta S.
        • Goren A.
        • Phillips A.L.
        • Dangond F.
        • Stewart M.
        Self-reported severity among patients with multiple sclerosis in the U.S. and its association with health outcomes.
        Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2014; 3: 78-88https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2013.06.002
        • Hategeka C.
        • Traboulsee A.L.
        • McMullen K.
        • Lynd L.D.
        Association of unemployment and informal care with stigma in multiple sclerosis: evidence from the survey on living with neurological conditions in Canada.
        Int. J. MS Care. 2019; 21: 214-225https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2017-108
        • Hillman L.
        Caregiving in multiple sclerosis.
        Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2013; 24: 619-627https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2013.06.007
        • Ho D.
        • Imai K.
        • King G.
        • Stuart E.A.
        MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference.
        J. Stat. Softw. 2011; 42: 1-28https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i08
        • Ivanova J.I.
        • Birnbaum H.G.
        • Samuels S.
        • Davis M.
        • Phillips A.L.
        • Meletiche D.
        The cost of disability and medically related absenteeism among employees with multiple sclerosis in the US.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 2009; 27: 681-691https://doi.org/10.2165/11314700-000000000-00000
        • Julian L.J.
        • Vella L.
        • Vollmer T.
        • Hadjimichael O.
        • Mohr D.C.
        Employment in multiple sclerosis. Exiting and re-entering the work force.
        J. Neurol. 2008; 255: 1354-1360https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-0910-y
        • Kalincik T.
        Multiple sclerosis relapses: epidemiology, outcomes and management. A systematic review.
        Neuroepidemiology. 2015; 44: 199-214https://doi.org/10.1159/000382130
        • Kister I.
        • Bacon T.E.
        • Chamot E.
        • Salter A.R.
        • Cutter G.R.
        • Kalina J.T.
        • Herbert J.
        Natural history of multiple sclerosis symptoms.
        Int. J. MS Care. 2013; 15: 146-158https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2012-053
        • Kobelt G.
        • Langdon D.
        • Jonsson L.
        The effect of self-assessed fatigue and subjective cognitive impairment on work capacity: the case of multiple sclerosis.
        Mult. Scler. 2019; 25: 740-749https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518769837
        • Kobelt G.
        • Thompson A.
        • Berg J.
        • Gannedahl M.
        • Eriksson J.
        New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe.
        Mult. Scler. 2017; 23: 1123-1136https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517694432
        • Krupp L.B.
        • Serafin D.J.
        • Christodoulou C.
        Multiple sclerosis-associated fatigue.
        Expert Rev. Neurother. 2010; 10: 1437-1447https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.10.99
        • Marchesi O.
        • Vizzino C.
        • Meani A.
        • Conti L.
        • Riccitelli G.C.
        • Preziosa P.
        • Filippi M.
        • Rocca M.A.
        Fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients with different clinical phenotypes: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study.
        Eur. J. Neurol. 2020; 27: 2549-2560https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14471
        • McKay K.A.
        • Kwan V.
        • Duggan T.
        • Tremlett H.
        Risk factors associated with the onset of relapsing-remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.
        Biomed. Res. Int. 2015; 2015817238https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/817238
        • Nicholas J.A.
        • Electricwala B.
        • Lee L.K.
        • Johnson K.M.
        Burden of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis on workers in the US: a cross-sectional analysis of survey data.
        BMC Neurol. 2019; 19: 258https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1495-z
        • Quan H.
        • Li B.
        • Couris C.M.
        • Fushimi K.
        • Graham P.
        • Hider P.
        • Januel J.M.
        • Sundararajan V.
        Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.
        Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011; 173: 676-682https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq433
        • Reilly M.C.
        • Zbrozek A.S.
        • Dukes E.M.
        The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 1993; 4: 353-365
        • Robinson R.L.
        • Stephenson J.J.
        • Dennehy E.B.
        • Grabner M.
        • Faries D.
        • Palli S.R.
        • Swindle R.W.
        The importance of unresolved fatigue in depression: costs and comorbidities.
        Psychosomatics. 2015; 56: 274-285https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2014.08.003
        • Salter A.
        • Thomas N.
        • Tyry T.
        • Cutter G.
        • Marrie R.A.
        Employment and absenteeism in working-age persons with multiple sclerosis.
        J. Med. Econ. 2017; 20: 493-502https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2016.1277229
        • Saunders L.L.
        • Krause J.S.
        Behavioral factors related to fatigue among persons with spinal cord injury.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2012; 93: 313-318https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.001
        • Simmons R.D.
        • Tribe K.L.
        • McDonald E.A.
        Living with multiple sclerosis: longitudinal changes in employment and the importance of symptom management.
        J. Neurol. 2010; 257: 926-936https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-5441-7
        • Smith M.M.
        • Arnett P.A.
        Factors related to employment status changes in individuals with multiple sclerosis.
        Mult. Scler. 2005; 11: 602-609https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458505ms1204oa
        • Spiegelberg N.
        • Breuer S.
        • Nielsen J.
        • Saliger J.
        • Montag C.
        • Karbe H.
        • Markett S.
        Cognitive fatigue predicts cognitive failure in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls: a case-control study.
        Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2021; 36: 908-917https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa118
        • Staff N.P.
        • Lucchinetti C.F.
        • Keegan B.M.
        Multiple sclerosis with predominant, severe cognitive impairment.
        Arch. Neurol. 2009; 66: 1139-1143https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.190
        • Strand V.
        • Shah R.
        • Atzinger C.
        • Zhou J.
        • Clewell J.
        • Ganguli A.
        • Tundia N.
        Economic burden of fatigue or morning stiffness among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis from real-world data.
        Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2020; 36: 161-168https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2019.1658974
        • Sutliff M.H.
        Contribution of impaired mobility to patient burden in multiple sclerosis.
        Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2010; 26: 109-119https://doi.org/10.1185/03007990903433528
      2. US Census Bureau, 2019. Quick facts. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219. (Accessed 10/18/21).

      3. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2020. American time use survey summary. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.htm. (Accessed 10/18/21).

      4. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2021a. Consumer price index for all urban consumers: medical care in U.S. city average. bls.gov. (Accessed 10/18/21).

      5. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2021b. Data retrieval: labor force statistics (CPS). bls.gov. (Accessed 10/18/21).

      6. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2021c. Labor force statistics from the current population survey. https://www.bls.gov/cps/. (Accessed 10/18/21).

        • Van der Hiele K.
        • Middelkoop H.A.
        • Ruimschotel R.
        • Kamminga N.G.
        • Visser L.H.
        A pilot study on factors involved with work participation in the early stages of multiple sclerosis.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9e105673https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105673
        • Wallin M.T.
        • Culpepper W.J.
        • Campbell J.D.
        • Nelson L.M.
        • Langer-Gould A.
        • Marrie R.A.
        • Cutter G.R.
        • Kaye W.E.
        • Wagner L.
        • Tremlett H.
        • Buka S.L.
        • Dilokthornsakul P.
        • Topol B.
        • Chen L.H.
        • LaRocca N.G.
        The prevalence of MS in the United States: a population-based estimate using health claims data.
        Neurology. 2019; 92: e1029-e1040https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007035