Advertisement

Longitudinal changes of financial hardship in patients with multiple sclerosis

      Highlights

      • A high proportion of patients with multiple sclerosis experience financial hardship.
      • Cost-related care non-adherence in multiple sclerosis accumulates over time.
      • Patients’ financial worry correlates with cost-related care non-adherence.
      • Clinical practices should focus on screening those at risk for financial hardship.
      • Interventions should focus on mitigating costs of care and improving outcomes.

      Abstract

      Objective

      : To measure the longitudinal changes in three domains of financial hardship (i.e., financial worry, cost-related care non-adherence, material hardship) in patients with MS.

      Methods

      : A convenience sample of 559 adult patients with a known diagnosis of MS visiting a single outpatient neurology clinic between July 2018 to February 2020 were approached. Patients completed surveys at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-enrollment. Outcomes included financial worry (using Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity Patient-Reported Outcome (COST)), cumulative cost-related care non-adherence, and cumulative financial hardship as adopted by Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Associations of financial worry with care non-adherence and material hardship were assessed using ANOVA.

      Results

      : A total of 242 (43.3%) participated at baseline. Mean age was 43.6 ± 13.6 years (76.9% female; 46.4% White); median months from diagnosis was 63 (IQR, 28–120). The mean COST score at enrollment was 17.43 (± 10.15) and increased to 19.41 (± 11.12) at 12 months (p = 0.09). Cumulative cost-related MS care non-adherence increased from 32.6% at baseline to 53.3% at 12 months (20.7% increase; p <0.001). Cumulative material hardship increased from 61.6% at baseline to 76.0% at 12 months (14.4% increase; p<0.001). Changes in COST score from baseline to 12 months were significantly associated with changes in non-adherence and material hardship (p<0.01).

      Conclusion and relevance

      : Cost-related care non-adherence and material hardship accumulate progressively over time and correlates with financial worry. Clinical practices should focus on screening those at risk and intervene with the goal of mitigating costs of care and improving patient outcomes.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. <bib id="bib1"label="Advisory Board Company" type="Other">The Advisory Board Company: Cancer Patient Financial Navigation: Helping patients manage their costs while protecting program margins. https://www.advisory.com/research/oncology-roundtable/studies/2014/cancer-patient-financial-navigation.

      2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Available at: https://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/. Accessed on Oct 24, 2019.

        • Altice C.K.
        • Banegas M.P.
        • Tucker-Seeley R.D.
        • KR Yabroff
        Financial hardships experienced by cancer survivors: a systematic review.
        J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2017; 109
        • Bandari D.S.
        • Sternaman D.
        • Chan T.
        • Prostko C.R.
        • Sapir T.
        Evaluating risks, costs, and benefits of new and emerging therapies to optimize outcomes in multiple sclerosis.
        J. Manag. Care Pharm. 2012; 18: 1-17
        • Charlson M.E.
        • Pompei P.
        • KL Ales
        • MacKenzie C.R.
        A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.
        J. Chronic. Dis. 1987; 40: 373-383
        • De Judicibus M.A.
        • McCabe M.P.
        The impact of the financial costs of multiple sclerosis on quality of life.
        Int. J. Behav. Med. 2007; 14: 3-11
        • de Souza J.A.
        • Yap B.J.
        • Hlubocky F.J.
        • et al.
        The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer: the COST measure.
        Cancer. 2014; 120: 3245-3253
        • de Souza J.A.
        • Yap B.J.
        • Wroblewski K.
        • et al.
        Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: the validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST).
        Cancer. 2017; 123: 476-484
        • Filippi M.
        • Rocca M.A.
        • Ciccarelli O.
        • et al.
        MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines.
        Lancet Neurol. 2016; 15: 292-303
        • Hartung D.M.
        • Bourdette D.N.
        • SM Ahmed
        • Whitham R.H.
        The cost of multiple sclerosis drugs in the US and the pharmaceutical industry: too big to fail?.
        Neurology. 2015; 84: 2185-2192
      3. Health Measures. Intro to PROMIS. Available at: http://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis/intro-to-promis. Accessed on November 12, 2017.

        • Himmelstein D.U.
        • Thorne D.
        • Warren E.
        • Woolhandler S
        Medical bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: results of a national study.
        Am. J. Med. 2009; 122: 741-746
        • Lathan C.S.
        • Cronin A.
        • Tucker-Seeley R.
        • Zafar S.Y.
        • Ayanian J.Z.
        • Schrag D
        Association of financial strain with symptom burden and quality of life for patients with lung or colorectal cancer.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 2016; 34: 1732-1740
        • Lizan L.
        • Comellas M.
        • Paz S.
        • Poveda J.L.
        • Meletiche D.M.
        • Polanco C.
        Treatment adherence and other patient-reported outcomes as cost determinants in multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature.
        Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014; 8: 1653-1664
        • Lown J.M.
        Development and validation of a financial self-efficacy scale.
        J.Financ. Couns. Plann. 2011; 22: 54-63
        • Lown J.M.
        Development and validation of a financial self-efficacy scale.
        J.Financ. Couns. Plann. 2011; 22: 54-63
        • McDonald W.I.
        • Compston A.
        • Edan G.
        • et al.
        Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
        Ann. Neurol. 2001; 50: 121-127
        • Miltenburger C.
        • Kobelt G.
        Quality of life and cost of multiple sclerosis.
        Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2002; 104: 272-275
        • Owens G.M.
        Economic burden of multiple sclerosis and the role of managed sare organizations in multiple sclerosis management.
        Am. J. Manag. Care. 2016; 22: s151-s158
        • Ramsey S.D.
        • Bansal A.
        • Fedorenko C.R.
        • et al.
        Financial insolvency as a risk factor for early mortality among patients with cancer.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 2016; 34: 980-986
        • Rosenkrantz A.B.
        • Sadigh G.
        • Carlos R.C.
        • Silva III, E.
        • Duszak Jr., R.
        Out-of-pocket costs for advanced imaging across the united states private insurance marketplace.
        J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2017; (In press)
        • Rumrill Jr., P.D.
        • Roessler R.T.
        • McMahon B.T.
        • Hennessey M.L.
        • Neath J
        Gender as a differential indicator of the employment discrimination experiences of Americans with multiple sclerosis.
        Work. 2007; 29: 303-311
        • Sadigh G.
        • Carlos R.C.
        • Krupinski E.A.
        • Meltzer C.C.
        • Duszak Jr., R.
        Health Care price transparency and communication: implications for radiologists and patients in an era of expanding shared decision making.
        AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2017; 209: 959-964
        • Sadigh G.
        • Lava N.
        • Switchenko J.
        • et al.
        Patient-reported financial toxicity in multiple sclerosis: predictors and association with care non-adherence.
        Mult. Scler. 2020; 1352458520913977
        • Shankaran V.
        • Jolly S.
        • Blough D.
        • SD Ramsey
        Risk factors for financial hardship in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer: a population-based exploratory analysis.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 2012; 30: 1608-1614
        • Sherman D.E.
        Transforming practices through the oncology care model: financial toxicity and counseling.
        J. Oncol. Pract. 2017; 13: 519-522
        • Troost J.P.
        • Gipson D.S.
        • Carlozzi N.E.
        • et al.
        Using PROMIS(R) to create clinically meaningful profiles of nephrotic syndrome patients.
        Health Psychol. 2019; 38: 410-421
      4. United States Census Bureay, Available at: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/atlantacitygeorgia/PST040219. Accessed on April 30, 2021.

        • Yabroff K.R.
        • Zhao J.
        • Zheng Z.
        • Rai A.
        • Han X
        Medical financial hardship among cancer survivors in the United States: what do we know? What do we need to know?.
        Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2018; 27: 1389-1397
        • Zafar S.Y.
        • McNeil R.B.
        • Thomas C.M.
        • Lathan C.S.
        • Ayanian J.Z.
        • Provenzale D
        Population-based assessment of cancer survivors’ financial burden and quality of life: a prospective cohort study.
        J. Oncol. Pract. 2015; 11: 145-150
        • Zafar S.Y.
        • Peppercorn J.M.
        • Schrag D.
        • et al.
        The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient's experience.
        Oncologist. 2013; 18: 381-390