Advertisement
Clinical trial| Volume 38, 101514, February 2020

The impact of diagnostic criteria and treatments on the 20-year costs for treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Published:November 09, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.101514

      Graphical abstract

      • Costs for treating multiple sclerosis decreased by 0.4% per patient after the introduction of 2011 diagnostic criteria.
      • The highest slope change in annual costs per patient was in 2015 (10%), after the introduction of Alemtuzumab.
      • Disease modifying treatments remain the main responsible for increased medical direct costs in multiple sclerosis.
      • Improved diagnostic skills and patient profiling can mitigate costs for treating multiple sclerosis at patient level.

      Abstract

      Objective

      To assess whether the introduction of the new diagnostic criteria and disease modifying therapies (DMTs) is associated with higher cost for treating multiple sclerosis (MS).

      Methods

      This is a regression-based quasi-experimental study employing interrupted time series analysis, including data from 2229 patients (age 42.1 ± 11.2 years; female 63.34%), with incident diagnosis of relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) and followed up from 1997 to 2017, extracted from the database of the MS Clinical Care and Research Centre of the Federico II University Hospital of Naples (Italy). Annual healthcare costs for DMT (e.g., prescription, staff involved in DMT administration) and management (e.g., neurological consultations, other consultations related to DMT safety, MRI, laboratory exams), were calculated and inflated to the most recent value.

      Results

      Annual costs per patient for DMT prescription and management were not affected by the introduction of 2001 and 2005 criteria, but decreased by 0.4% after the introduction of 2011 criteria (PD= -0.4%; 95% C.I. -0.7%/-0.0%; p = 0.023). Annual costs per patient increased by 11.2% after the introduction of Natalizumab in 2007 (PD= 11.2%; 95% C.I.= 9.4%/13.0%; p <0.001), by 10.9% after the introduction of tablets in 2011 (Fingolimod, Teriflunomide and Dimethyl Fumarate) (PD= 10.9%; 95% C.I. 9.2%/12.7%; p<0.001), and by 10.7% after the introduction of Alemtuzumab in 2015 (PD= 10.7%; 95% C.I. 9.0%/12.4%; p< 0.001).

      Discussion

      DMTs remain the main responsible for increased medical direct costs in MS, whilst improved diagnostic skills and subsequent patient profiling can at least in part mitigate costs for MS treatment and management.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, 2019. Banca Dati Farmaci dell'AIFA [WWW Document]. URLhttps://www.farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/(accessed 9.18.19).

      2. Bank of Italy, n.d. Euro foreign exchange reference rates as of 5 Apr 2019 [WWW Document]. URLhttps://www.bancaditalia.it/compiti/operazioni-cambi/cambio/cambi_rif_20190405/(accessed 4.5.19).

        • Bärnighausen T.
        • Tugwell P.
        • Røttingen J.A.
        • Shemilt I.
        • Rockers P.
        • Geldsetzer P.
        • Lavis J.
        • Grimshaw J.
        • Daniels K.
        • Brown A.
        • Bor J.
        • Tanner J.
        • Rashidian A.
        • Barreto M.
        • Vollmer S.
        • Atun R.
        Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 4: uses and value.
        J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2017; 89: 21-29https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.012
        • Battaglia M.
        • Kobelt G.
        • Ponzio M.
        • Berg J.
        • Capsa D.
        • Dalén J.
        • Platform, and the E.M.S.
        New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe: Results for italy.
        Mult. Scler. 2017; 23: 104-116https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517708125
        • Bernal J.
        • Cummins S.
        • Gasparrini A.
        Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.
        Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017; 46: 348-355https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw098
        • Berto P.
        • Amato M.P.
        • Bellantonio P.
        • Bortolon F.
        • Cavalla P.
        • Florio C.
        • Lugaresi A.
        • Montanari E.
        • Rottoli M.
        • Simone I.L.
        • Zaffaroni M.
        The direct cost of patients with multiple sclerosis: a survey from Italian Ms centres.
        Neurol. Sci. 2011; 32: 1035-1041https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0578-4
        • Brown M.G.
        Cost of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis.
        Neurology. 2015; 84: e181-e185https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001676
        • Brownlee W.
        • Swanton J.
        • Altmann D.
        • Ciccarelli O.
        • Miller D.
        Earlier and more frequent diagnosis of multiple sclerosis using the McDonald criteria.
        J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2015; 86: 584-585https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2014-308675
        • Brownlee W.J.
        Use (and misuse) of the McDonald criteria to diagnose multiple sclerosis.
        Eur. J. Neurol. 2018; 25: 209-210https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13501
        • Brownlee W.J.
        • Hardy T.
        • Fazekas F.
        • Miller D.
        Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges.
        Lancet. 2017; 389: 1336-1346https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30959-X
        • Capone F.
        • Collorone S.
        • Cortese R.
        • Di Lazzaro V.
        • Moccia M.
        Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: the role of thalamus.
        Mult. Scler. 2019; (1352458519851247)https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458519851247
        • Cerqueira J.J.
        • Compston D.A.S.
        • Geraldes R.
        • Rosa M.M.
        • Schmierer K.
        • Thompson A.
        • Tinelli M.
        • Palace J.
        Time matters in multiple sclerosis: can early treatment and long-term follow-up ensure everyone benefits from the latest advances in multiple sclerosis?.
        J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2018; 89: 844-850https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-317509
        • Chalmer T.A.
        • Baggesen L.M.
        • Nørgaard M.
        • Koch-Henriksen N.
        • Magyari M.
        • Sorensen P.S.
        Early versus later treatment start in multiple sclerosis: a register-based cohort study.
        Eur. J. Neurol. 2018; 25: 1262-e110https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13692
        • Chard D.
        • Dalton C.
        • Swanton J.
        • Fisniku L.
        • Miszkiel K.
        • Thompson A.
        • Plant G.
        • Miller D.
        MRI only conversion to multiple sclerosis following a clinically isolated syndrome.
        J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2011; 82: 176-179https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2010.208660
        • Claflin S.B.
        • Broadley S.
        • Taylor B.V.
        The effect of disease modifying therapies on disability progression in multiple sclerosis: a systematic overview of meta-analyses.
        Front. Neurol. 2019; 10101374https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01150
        • Ernstsson O.
        • Gyllensten H.
        • Alexanderson K.
        • Tinghög P.
        • Friberg E.
        • Norlund A.
        Cost of illness of multiple sclerosis - A Systematic review.
        PLoS ONE. 2016; 11e0159129https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159129
      3. European Medicine Agency, EMA, 2019. European public assessment reports. [WWW Document]. URLhttps://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines(accessed 9.18.19).

        • Filippi M.
        • Preziosa P.
        • Meani A.
        • Ciccarelli O.
        • Mesaros S.
        • Rovira A.
        • Frederiksen J.
        • Enzinger C.
        • Barkhof F.
        • Gasperini C.
        • Brownlee W.
        • Drulovic J.
        • Montalban X.
        • Cramer S.P.
        • Pichler A.
        • Hagens M.
        • Ruggieri S.
        • Martinelli V.
        • Miszkiel K.
        • Tintorè M.
        • Comi G.
        • Dekker I.
        • Uitdehaag B.
        • Dujmovic-Basuroski I.
        • Rocca M.A.
        Prediction of a multiple sclerosis diagnosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome using the 2016 Magnims and 2010 McDonald criteria: a retrospective study.
        Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17: 133-142https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30469-6
        • Giovannoni G.
        • Turner B.
        • Gnanapavan S.
        • Offiah C.
        • Schmierer K.
        • Marta M.
        Is it time to target no evident disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis?.
        Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2015; 4: 329-333https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2015.04.006
        • Gyllensten H.
        • Kavaliunas A.
        • Murley C.
        • Alexanderson K.
        • Hillert J.
        • Tinghög P.
        • Friberg E.
        Costs of illness progression for different multiple sclerosis phenotypes: a population-based study in Sweden.
        Mult. Scler. J. - Exp. Transl. Clin. 2019; 5205521731985838https://doi.org/10.1177/2055217319858383
        • Hagens M.H.J.
        • Burggraaff J.
        • Kilsdonk I.D.
        • Ruggieri S.
        • Collorone S.
        • Cortese R.
        • Cawley N.
        • Sbardella E.
        • Andelova M.
        • Amann M.
        • Lieb J.M.
        • Pantano P.
        • Lissenberg-Witte B.I.
        • Killestein J.
        • Oreja-Guevara C.
        • Wuerfel J.
        • Ciccarelli O.
        • Gasperini C.
        • Lukas C.
        • Rovira A.
        • Barkhof F.
        • Wattjes M.P.
        Impact of 3 Tesla MRI on interobserver agreement in clinically isolated syndrome: a magnims multicentre study.
        Mult. Scler. J. 2019; 25: 352-360https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517751647
        • Hartung D.
        Economics and cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis therapies in the USA.
        Neurotherapeutics. 2017; 14: 1018-1026https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0566-3
        • Hartung D.M.
        • Bourdette D.N.
        • Ahmed S.M.
        • Whitham R.H.
        The cost of multiple sclerosis drugs in the US and the pharmaceutical industry: too big to fail?.
        Neurology. 2015; 84: 2185-2192https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001608
        • Hernandez L.
        • O'Donnell M.
        • Postma M.
        Modeling approaches in cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an updated systematic review and recommendations for future economic evaluations.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 2018; 36: 1223-1252https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0683-9
        • Iannazzo S.
        • Iliza A.
        • Perrault L.
        Disease-Modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: a systematic literature review of cost-effectiveness studies.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 2018; 36: 189-204https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0577-2
        • Kalincik T.
        • Manouchehrinia A.
        • Sobisek L.
        • Jokubaitis V.
        • Spelman T.
        • Horakova D.
        • Havrdova E.
        • Trojano M.
        • Izquierdo G.
        • Lugaresi A.
        • Girard M.
        • Prat A.
        • Duquette P.
        • Grammond P.
        • Sola P.
        • Hupperts R.
        • Grand'Maison F.
        • Pucci E.
        • Boz C.
        • Alroughani R.
        • Van Pesch V.
        • Lechner-Scott J.
        • Terzi M.
        • Bergamaschi R.
        • Iuliano G.
        • Granella F.
        • Spitaleri D.
        • Shaygannejad V.
        • Oreja-Guevara C.
        • Slee M.
        • Ampapa R.
        • Verheul F.
        • McCombe P.
        • Olascoaga J.
        • Amato M.P.
        • Vucic S.
        • Hodgkinson S.
        • Ramo-Tello C.
        • Flechter S.
        • Cristiano E.
        • Rozsa C.
        • Moore F.
        • Sanchez-Menoyo J.L.
        • Saladino M.L.
        • Barnett M.
        • Hillert J.
        • Butzkueven H.
        Towards personalized therapy for multiple sclerosis: prediction of individual treatment response.
        Brain. 2017; 140: 1426-2443https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx185
        • Karampampa K.
        • Gustavsson A.
        • van Munster E.T.L.
        • Hupperts R.M.M.
        • Sanders E.A.C.M.
        • Mostert J.
        • Sinnige O.L.G.F.
        • de Graaf J.
        • Pop P.
        • Miltenburger C.
        • Groot M.T.
        • Relleke M.
        • van der Hel W.S.
        Treatment experience, burden, and unmet needs (TRIBUNE) in multiple sclerosis study: the costs and utilities of MS patients in The Netherlands.
        J. Med. Econ. 2013; 16: 939-950https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2013.807267
        • Kobelt G.
        • Thompson A.
        • Berg J.
        • Gannedahl M.
        • Eriksson J.
        New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe.
        Mult. Scler. 2017; 23: 1123-1136https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517694432
        • Kremer D.
        • Küry P.
        • Dutta R.
        Promoting remyelination in multiple sclerosis: current drugs and future prospects.
        Mult. Scler. 2015; 21: 541-549https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458514566419
        • Lee D.H.
        • Peschke M.
        • Utz K.S.
        • Linker R.A.
        Diagnostic value of the 2017 McDonald criteria in patients with a first demyelinating event suggestive of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis.
        Eur. J. Neurol. 2019; 26: 540-545https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13853
        • McCarthy M.
        US senate committee launches investigation into drug pricing.
        BMJ. 2015; 351: h5989https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5989
        • McDonald W.I.
        • Compston A.
        • Edan G.
        • Goodkin D.
        • Hartung H.P.
        • Lublin F.D.
        • McFarland H.F.
        • Paty D.W.
        • Polman C.H.
        • Reingold S.C.
        • Sandberg-Wollheim M.
        • Sibley W.
        • Thompson A.
        • Van Den Noort S.
        • Weinshenker B.Y.
        • Wolinsky J.S.
        Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
        Ann. Neurol. 2001; 50: 121-127
        • Menditto E.
        • Orlando V.
        • Coretti S.
        • Putignano D.
        • Fiorentino D.
        • Ruggeri M.
        Doctors commitment and long-term effectiveness for cost containment policies: lesson learned from biosimilar drugs.
        Clin. Outcomes Res. 2015; : 575-581https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S88531
        • Moccia M.
        • Palladino R.
        • Carotenuto A.
        • Saccà F.
        • Russo C.V.
        • Lanzillo R.
        • Brescia Morra V.
        A 8-year retrospective cohort study comparing interferon-β formulations for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis.
        Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2018; 19https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2017.11.006
        • Moccia M.
        • Palladino R.
        • Lanzillo R.
        • Carotenuto A.
        • Russo C.V.
        • Triassi M.
        • Brescia Morra V.
        Healthcare costs for treating relapsing multiple sclerosis and the risk of progression: a retrospective italian cohort study from 2001 to 2015.
        PLoS ONE. 2017; 12e0169489https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169489
        • Moccia M.
        • Palladino R.
        • Lanzillo R.
        • Triassi M.
        • Brescia Morra V.
        Predictors of the 10-year direct costs for treating multiple sclerosis.
        Acta Neurol. Scand. 2017; 135: 522-528https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12630
        • Moccia M.
        • Tajani A.
        • Acampora R.
        • Signoriello E.
        • Corbisiero G.
        • Vercellone A.
        • Sergianni P.
        • Pennino F.
        • Lanzillo R.
        • Palladino R.
        • Capacchione A.
        • Brescia Morra V.
        • Lus G.
        • Triassi M.
        • Brescia V.
        • Lus G.
        • Triassi M.
        • Brescia Morra V.
        • Lus G.
        • Triassi M.
        Healthcare resource utilization and costs for multiple sclerosis management in the campania region of italy: comparison between centre-based and local service healthcare delivery.
        PLoS ONE. 2019; 14e0222012https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222012
        • Naci H.
        • Fleurence R.
        • Birt J.
        • Duhig A.
        Economic burden of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 2010; 28: 363-379https://doi.org/10.2165/11532230-000000000-00000
        • Palladino R.
        • Lee J.T.
        • Hone T.
        • Filippidis F.T.
        • Millett C.
        The great recession and increased cost sharing in European health systems.
        Health Aff. 2016; 35: 1204-1213https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1170
        • Polman C.H.
        • Reingold S.C.
        • Banwell B.
        • Clanet M.
        • Cohen J.a.
        • Filippi M.
        • Fujihara K.
        • Havrdova E.
        • Hutchinson M.
        • Kappos L.
        • Lublin F.D.
        • Montalban X.
        • O'Connor P.
        • Sandberg-Wollheim M.
        • Thompson A.J.
        • Waubant E.
        • Weinshenker B.
        • Wolinsky J.S.
        Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria.
        Ann. Neurol. 2011; 69: 292-302https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22366
        • Polman C.H.
        • Reingold S.C.
        • Edan G.
        • Filippi M.
        • Hartung H.P.
        • Kappos L.
        • Lublin F.D.
        • Metz L.M.
        • McFarland H.F.
        • O'Connor P.W.
        • Sandberg-Wollheim M.
        • Thompson A.J.
        • Weinshenker B.G.
        • Wolinsky J.S.
        Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald criteria.
        Ann. Neurol. 2005; 58: 840-846https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20703
        • Ponzio M.
        • Gerzeli S.
        • Brichetto G.
        • Bezzini D.
        • Mancardi G.L.
        • Zaratin P.
        • Battaglia M.A.
        Economic impact of multiple sclerosis in italy: focus on rehabilitation costs.
        Neurol. Sci. 2015; 36: 227-234https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1925-z
        • Raggi A.
        • Leonardi M.
        Burden and cost of neurological diseases: a European north-south comparison.
        Acta Neurol. Scand. 2014; : 1-7https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12339
        • Reeves B.C.
        • Wells G.A.
        • Waddington H.
        Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 5: a checklist for classifying studies evaluating the effects on health interventions—a taxonomy without labels.
        J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2017; 89: 30-42https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.016
        • Ruggeri M.
        • Manca A.
        • Coretti S.
        • Codella P.
        • Iacopino V.
        • Romano F.
        • Mascia D.
        • Orlando V.
        • Cicchetti A.
        Investigating the generalizability of economic evaluations conducted in Italy: a critical review.
        Value Heal. 2015; 18: 709-720https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.1795
        • Sorensen P.S.
        • Giovannoni G.
        • Montalban X.
        • Thalheim C.
        • Zaratin P.
        • Comi G.
        The multiple sclerosis care unit.
        Mult. Scler. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518807082
        • Thompson A.J.
        • Banwell B.L.
        • Barkhof F.
        • Carroll W.M.
        • Coetzee T.
        • Comi G.
        • Correale J.
        • Fazekas F.
        • Filippi M.
        • Freedman M.S.
        • Fujihara K.
        • Galetta S.L.
        • Hartung H.P.
        • Kappos L.
        • Lublin F.D.
        • Marrie R.A.
        • Miller A.E.
        • Miller D.H.
        • Montalban X.
        • Mowry E.M.
        • Sorensen P.S.
        • Tintoré M.
        • Traboulsee A.L.
        • Trojano M.
        • Uitdehaag B.M.J.
        • Vukusic S.
        • Waubant E.
        • Weinshenker B.G.
        • Reingold S.C.
        • Cohen J.A.
        Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria.
        Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17: 162-173https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2
        • Thompson A.J.
        • Baranzini S.E.
        • Geurts J.
        • Hemmer B.
        • Ciccarelli O.
        Multiple sclerosis.
        Lancet. 2018; 391: 1622-1636https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30481-1
        • Trojano M.
        • Tintore M.
        • Montalban X.
        • Hillert J.
        • Kalincik T.
        • Iaffaldano P.
        • Spelman T.
        • Sormani M.
        • Butzkueven H.
        Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies.
        Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017; 13: 105-118https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.188
        • Wingerchuk D.M.
        • Carter J.L.
        Multiple sclerosis: current and emerging disease-modifying therapies and treatment strategies.
        Mayo Clin. Proc. 2014; 89: 225-240https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.002
        • Zimmermann M.
        • Brouwer E.
        • Tice J.
        • Seidner M.
        • Loos A.
        • Liu S.
        • Chapman R.
        • Kumar V.
        • Carlson J.
        Disease-Modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a cost-utility analysis.
        CNS Drugs. 2018; 32: 1145-1157https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-018-0566-9