Advertisement
Clinical trial| Volume 38, 101504, February 2020

Alemtuzumab treatment of multiple sclerosis in real-world clinical practice: A report from a single Italian center

Published:November 05, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.101504

      Highlights

      • Safety profile of alemtuzumab may differ in real-world populations compared to subject investigated in clinical trials.
      • The switch to alemtuzumab must take into account previous therapeutic regimens.
      • The implementation of a monitoring program is crucial to recognize and promptly manage adverse events.
      • The efficacy of alemtuzumab is maintained after other second line therapies.

      Abstract

      Background

      Alemtuzumab, is a compound approved for highly active MS, and, in Europe, employed after the use of other disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) with an escalation approach or used as a first therapeutic option. The occurrence of secondary autoimmune adverse events and or infections can differ depending on the employed approach.

      Objective

      To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in real-world MS population that encompassed patients previously treated with other DMTs.

      Methods

      35 patients, treated with alemtuzumab in a single MS Center, were followed for at least 36 months. The study investigated the prevalence of patients reaching the phase of the non-active disease (NEDA-3). All the adverse events were also reported, and correlations assessed.

      Results

      At the 36-month follow-up, 66,7% of patients achieved the NEDA-3 status, 90,5% of the patients were relapse-free, 85,7% showed no signs of disability progression, nor signs of MRI activity. Adverse events were observed in 45,7% of the patients and ranked as severe in 23% of them. Cases of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), pancytopenia, viral hepatitis E, and noninfectious meningo-encephalomyelitis were found and reported. For these complications, the post hoc analysis showed possible interactive factors and causality related to previous DMT treatments.

      Conclusions

      In a real-world MS population like the one investigated in our study, alemtuzumab was found to be an effective treatment when employed as an escalation or rescue therapy. The compound exhibits a variable safety profile and frequent adverse events that are likely depending on previous treatments and their impact on the immune system.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Devonshire V.
        • et al.
        Monitoring and management of autoimmunity in multiple sclerosis patients treated with alemtuzumab: practical recommendations.
        J. Neurol. 2018; 265: 2494-2505
        • Wray S.
        • et al.
        Infection risk with alemtuzumab decreases over time: pooled analysis of 6-year data from the CAMMS223, care-ms I, and care-ms II studies and the CAMMS03409 extension study.
        Mult. Scler. 2018; (Epub ahead of print)https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518796675
        • Cohen J.A .
        • CARE-MS I investigators
        Alemtuzumab versus interferon beta 1a as first-line treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 1819-1828
        • Coles A.J .
        • CARE-MS II investigators
        Alemtuzumab for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after disease-modifying therapy: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 1829-1839
        • Ziemssen T.
        • Thomas K.
        Alemtuzumab in the long-term treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an update on the clinical trial evidence and data from the real world.
        Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2017; 10: 343-359
        • Jones J.L.
        • Coles A.J
        Mode of action and clinical studies with alemtuzumab.
        Exp. Neurol. 2014; 262 (Pt A): 37-43
        • di Ioia M.
        • et al.
        Simultaneous early-onset severe autoimmune hemolytic anemia and albuminuria duringalemtuzumab treatment for multiple sclerosis.
        Mult. Scler. 2018; 6: 813-815
        • Pisa M.
        • et al.
        Acquired haemophilia a as a secondary autoimmune disease after alemtuzumab treatment in multiple sclerosis: a case report.
        Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2018; 27: 403-405
        • Madeley J.
        • Hodges G.
        • Birchley A
        Development of acquired haemophilia A in a patient treated with alemtuzumab for multiple sclerosis.
        BMJ Case Rep. 2018; (pii: bcr-2018-226588)https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2018-226588
        • McCaughan G.
        • et al.
        Acquired haemophilia A complicating alemtuzumab therapy for multiple sclerosis.
        BMJ Case Rep. 2017; (pii: bcr-2017-223016)https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017-223016
        • Jones J.L.
        • et al.
        Human autoimmunity after lymphocyte depletion is caused by homeostatic T-cell proliferation.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2013; 110: 20200-20205
        • Baker D.
        • et al.
        Interpreting lymphocyte reconstitution data from the pivotal phase 3 trials of alemtuzumab.
        JAMA Neurol. 2017; 74: 961-969
        • Berger T.
        • et al.
        Alemtuzumab use in clinical practice: recommendations from European multiple sclerosis experts.
        CNS Drugs. 2017; 31: 33-50
        • Polman C.H.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the Mcdonald criteria.
        Ann. Neurol. 2011; 69: 292-302
        • Havrdova E.
        • et al.
        Understanding the positive benefit:risk profile of alemtuzumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: perspectives from the alemtuzumab clinical development program.
        Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2017; 13: 1423-1437
        • Giovannoni G.
        • et al.
        Is it time to target no evident disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis?.
        Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2015; 4: 329-333
        • Río J.
        • et al.
        Defining the response to interferon-beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.
        Ann. Neurol. 2006; 59: 344-352
        • Phillips J.T.
        • et al.
        Sustained improvement in Expanded Disability Status Scale as a new efficacy measure of neurological change in multiple sclerosis: treatment effects with natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.
        Mult. Scler. 2011; 17: 970-979
        • Prosperini L.
        • Italian Alemtuzumab Study Group
        No evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) and disability improvement after alemtuzumabtreatment for multiple sclerosis: a 36-month real-world study.
        J. Neurol. 2018; 265: 2851-2860
        • Giovannoni G.
        • CARE-MS II Investigators
        Alemtuzumab improves preexisting disability in active relapsing-remitting MS patients.
        Neurology. 2016; 87: 1985-1992
        • Haghikia A.
        • et al.
        Severe B-cell-mediated CNS disease secondary to alemtuzumab therapy.
        Lancet Neurol. 2017; 16: 104-106
        • Malucchi S.
        • et al.
        High-Risk PML patients switching from natalizumab to alemtuzumab: an observational study.
        Neurol. Ther. 2017; 6: 145-152