Advertisement

Incidence of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis in referrals to two academic centers

Published:February 01, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.01.048

      Highlights

      • Accurate multiple sclerosis diagnosis can be challenging.
      • 18% of new MS patients in two clinics were determined to be misdiagnosed.
      • Misdiagnosis is associated with atypical clinical or imaging findings.
      • Misdiagnosed patients receive years of unnecessary MS medications.
      • Migraine is the most common alternate diagnosis.

      Abstract

      Background

      Multiple Sclerosis (MS) specialists routinely evaluate misdiagnosed patients, or patients incorrectly assigned a diagnosis of MS. Misdiagnosis has significant implications for patient morbidity and healthcare costs, yet its contemporary incidence is unknown. We examined the incidence of MS misdiagnosis in new patients referred to two academic MS referral centers, their most common alternate diagnoses, and factors associated with misdiagnosis.

      Methods

      Demographic data, comorbidities, neurological examination findings, radiographic and laboratory results, a determination of 2010 McDonald Criteria fulfillment, and final diagnoses were collected from all new patient evaluations completed at the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and the University of California, Los Angeles MS clinics over twelve months.

      Results

      Of the 241 new patients referred with an established diagnosis of MS, 17% at Cedars-Sinai and 19% at UCLA were identified as having been misdiagnosed. The most common alternative diagnoses were migraine (16%), radiologically isolated syndrome (9%), spondylopathy (7%), and neuropathy (7%). Clinical syndromes and radiographic findings atypical for MS were both associated with misdiagnosis. The misdiagnosed group received approximately 110 patient-years of unnecessary MS disease modifying therapy.

      Conclusion

      MS misdiagnosis is common; in our combined cohort, almost 1 in 5 patients who carried an established diagnosis of MS did not fulfill contemporary McDonald Criteria and had a more likely alternate diagnosis.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Thompson AJ
        • Banwell BL
        • Barkhof F
        • et al.
        Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria.
        Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17: 162-173
        • Solomon AJ
        • Klein EP
        • Bourdette D
        Undiagnosing” multiple sclerosis: the challenge of misdiagnosis in MS.
        Neurology. 2012; 78: 1986-1991
        • Murray TJ
        • Murray SJ
        Characteristics of patients found not to have multiple sclerosis.
        Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1984; 131: 336-337
        • Herndon RM
        • Brooks B
        Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
        in: Paper presented at: Seminars in Neurology. 1985
        • Engell T
        A clinico-pathoanatomical study of multiple sclerosis diagnosis.
        Acta Neurol. Scand. 1988; 78: 34-44
        • Hankey GJ
        • Stewart-Wynne EG.
        Pseudo-multiple sclerosis: a clinico-epidemiological study.
        Clin. Exp. Neurol. 1987; : 11-19
        • Yamout BI
        • Khoury SJ
        • Ayyoubi N
        • et al.
        Alternative diagnoses in patients referred to specialized centers for suspected MS.
        Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2017; 18: 85-89
        • Carmosino MJ
        • Fau BK
        • Arciniegas DB
        • Corboy JR
        Initial evaluations for multiple sclerosis in a university multiple sclerosis center: outcomes and role of magnetic resonance imaging in referral.
        Arch. Neurol. 2005; 62: 585-589
        • Poser CM
        Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis and β-interferon.
        Lancet. 1997; 349: 1916
        • Solomon AJ
        • Bourdette DN
        • Cross AH
        • et al.
        The contemporary spectrum of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis: a multicenter study.
        Neurology. 2016; 87: 1393-1396
        • Polman Chris H
        • Reingold Stephen C
        • Banwell B
        • et al.
        Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria.
        Ann. Neurol. 2011; 69: 292-302
        • Brownlee WJ
        • Hardy TA
        • Fazekas F
        • Miller DH
        Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges.
        Lancet. 2017; 389: 1336-1346
        • Charil A
        • Yousry Ta Fau - Rovaris M
        • Rovaris M Fau - Barkhof F
        • et al.
        MRI and the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: expanding the concept of "no better explanation".
        Lancet Neurol. 2006; 5: 841-852
        • Boster A
        • Caon C
        • Perumal J
        • et al.
        Failure to develop multiple sclerosis in patients with neurologic symptoms without objective evidence.
        Mult. Scler. J. 2008; 14: 804-808
        • Liu S
        • Kullnat J Fau - Bourdette D
        • Bourdette D Fau - Simon J
        • et al.
        Prevalence of brain magnetic resonance imaging meeting Barkhof and McDonald criteria for dissemination in space among headache patients.
        Mult. Scler. 2013; 19: 1101-1105
        • McDonald WI
        • Compston A
        • Edan G
        • et al.
        Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
        Ann. Neurol. 2001; 50: 121-127
        • Polman CH
        • Reingold SC
        • Edan G
        • et al.
        Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”.
        Ann. Neurol. 2005; 58: 840-846
        • Kuhle J
        • Disanto G
        • Dobson R
        • et al.
        Conversion from clinically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis: a large multicentre study.
        Mult. Scler. J. 2015; 21: 1013-1024
        • Okuda DT
        • Mowry EM
        • Beheshtian A
        • et al.
        Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosis.
        Neurology. 2009; 72: 800
        • Major EO
        • Yousry TA
        • Clifford DB
        Pathogenesis of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and risks associated with treatments for multiple sclerosis: a decade of lessons learned.
        Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17: 467-480
      1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Access to MS Medications. 2017.

        • Browne P
        • Chandraratna D
        • Angood C
        • et al.
        Atlas of Multiple Sclerosis 2013: a growing global problem with widespread inequity.
        Neurology. 2014; 83: 1022-1024
        • Solomon AJ
        Instead of tweaking the diagnostic criteria for MS in those with CIS, we should develop diagnostic criteria that distinguish MS from other conditions – Yes.
        Mult. Scler. J. 2019; 1352458518813107