Commentary| Volume 21, P108-109, April 2018

Online validation of the Italian version of the patient determined disease steps scale (PDDS) in people with multiple sclerosis

Published:February 12, 2018DOI:
      In the MSARD issue of November 2017, our study has provided a validation of the Italian version of the Patient Determined Disease Steps scale (PDDS) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) (
      • Lavorgna L.
      • Sparaco M.
      • Esposito S.
      • Motl R.W.
      • Gallo A.
      • Bisecco A.
      • Tedeschi G.
      • Bonavita S.
      ) (reference number MSARD-D-17–00229).
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Bernstein A.N.
        • Levinson A.W.
        • Hobbs A.R.
        • Lavery H.J.
        • Samadi D.B.
        Validation of online administration of the sexual health inventory for men.
        J. Urol. 2013; 189: 1456-1461
        • Bishop F.L.
        • Lewis G.
        • Harris S.
        • McKay N.
        • Prentice P.
        • Thiel H.
        • Lewith G.T.
        A within-subjects trial to test the equivalence of online and paper outcome measures: the Roland Morris disability questionnaire.
        BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2010; 11 (8 June 2010)
        • Coons S.J.
        • Gwaltney C.J.
        • Hays R.D.
        • Lundy J.J.
        • Sloan J.A.
        • Revicki D.A.
        • et al.
        Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ispor ePRO good research practices task force report.
        Value Health. 2009; 12: 419-429
      1. F.a. D. A. (FDA), 2009. Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Retreived December, 2009.

        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Norman G.R.
        • Junipera E.F.
        • et al.
        A critical look at transition ratings.
        J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2002; 55: 19
        • Gwaltney C.J.
        • Shields A.L.
        • Shiffman S.
        Equivalence od electronic and paper and pencil administration of patient reported outcome measures: a meta analiytic review.
        Value Health. 2008; 11: 322-333
        • Jaeschke R.
        • Singer J.
        • Guyatt G.H.
        Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.
        Control Clin. Trials. 1989; 10: 407-415
        • Lavorgna L.
        • Sparaco M.
        • Esposito S.
        • Motl R.W.
        • Gallo A.
        • Bisecco A.
        • Tedeschi G.
        • Bonavita S.
        Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2017; 18: 173-176
        • Vallejo M.A.
        • Jordán C.M.
        • Díaz M.I.
        • Comeche M.I.
        • Ortega J.
        Psychological assessment via the internet: a reliability and validity study of online (vs paper-and-pencil) versions of the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) and the Symptoms Check-List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R).
        J. Med. Internet Res. 2007; 9 (Jan31): e2