Online validation of the Italian version of the patient determined disease steps scale (PDDS) in people with multiple sclerosis

References

1. • Bernstein A.N.
   • Levinson A.W.
   • Hobbs A.R.
   • Lavery H.J.
   • Samadi D.B.
   Validation of online administration of the sexual health inventory for men.
   J. Urol. 2013; 189: 1456-1461
   View in Article

   • Scopus (11)
   • PubMed
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
2. • Bishop F.L.
   • Lewis G.
   • Harris S.
   • McKay N.
   • Prentice P.
   • Thiel H.
   • Lewith G.T.
   A within-subjects trial to test the equivalence of online and paper outcome measures: the Roland Morris disability questionnaire.
   BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2010; 11 (8 June 2010)
   View in Article

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. • Coons S.J.
   • Gwaltney C.J.
   • Hays R.D.
   • Lundy J.J.
   • Sloan J.A.
   • Revicki D.A.
   • et al.
   Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ispor ePRO good research practices task force report.
   Value Health. 2009; 12: 419-429
   View in Article

   • Scopus (341)
   • PubMed
   • Abstract
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar

4. F.a. D. A. (FDA), 2009. Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Retreived December, 2009.

   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Guyatt G.H.
   • Norman G.R.
   • Junipera E.F.
   • et al.
   A critical look at transition ratings.
   J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2002; 55: 19
   View in Article

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. • Gwaltney C.J.
   • Shields A.L.
   • Shiffman S.
   Equivalence od electronic and paper and pencil administration of patient reported outcome measures: a meta analiytic review.
   Value Health. 2008; 11: 322-333
   View in Article

   • Scopus (442)
   • PubMed
   • Abstract
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
7. • Jaeschke R.
   • Singer J.
   • Guyatt G.H.
   Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.
   Control Clin. Trials. 1989; 10: 407-415
   View in Article

   • Scopus (3431)
   • PubMed
   • Abstract
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
8. • Lavorgna L.
   • Sparaco M.
   • Esposito S.
   • Motl R.W.
   • Gallo A.
   • Bisecco A.
   • Tedeschi G.
   • Bonavita S.
   Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2017; 18: 173-176
   View in Article

   • Scopus (14)
   • PubMed
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
9. • Vallejo M.A.
   • Jordán C.M.
   • Díaz M.I.
   • Comeche M.I.
   • Ortega J.
   Psychological assessment via the internet: a reliability and validity study of online (vs paper-and-pencil) versions of the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) and the Symptoms Check-List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R).
   J. Med. Internet Res. 2007; 9 (Jan31): e2
   View in Article

   • Scopus (157)
   • PubMed
   • Crossref
   • Google Scholar